Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26384352›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2015

Free intraperitoneal tumor cells and outcome in gastric cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mathieu Pecqueux, Johannes Fritzmann, Mariam Adamu, Kristian Thorlund, Christoph Kahlert, Christoph Reißfelder, Jürgen Weitz, Nuh N Rahbari

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diagnostic value of negative enrichment and immune fluorescenceChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Does histology really influence gastric cancer prognosis?Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. World journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Article
  19. NTRK2 is an oncogene and associated with microRNA-22 regulation in human gastric cancer cell lines.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  20. miR-204 regulates the EMT by targeting snai1 to suppress the invasion and migration of gastric cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mathieu PecqueuxDepartment for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Johannes FritzmannDepartment for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Mariam AdamuDepartment for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Kristian ThorlundDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Christoph KahlertDepartment for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Christoph ReißfelderDepartment for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jürgen WeitzDepartment for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Nuh N RahbariDepartment for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
TU Dresden · DEMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite continuously improving therapies, gastric cancer still shows poor survival in locally advanced stages with local recurrence rates of up to 50% and peritoneal recurrence rates of 17% after curative surgery. We performed a systematic review with meta-analyses to clarify whether positive intraperitoneal cytology (IPC) indicates a high risk of disease recurrence and poor overall survival in gastric cancer.

methodsMultiple databases were searched in December 2014 to identify studies on the prognostic significance of positive intraperitoneal cytology in gastric cancer, including: Medline, Biosis, Science Citation Index, Embase, CCMed and publisher databases. Hazard ratios (HR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted from the identified studies. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model on overall survival, disease-free survival and peritoneal recurrence free survival.

resultsA total of 64 studies with a cumulative sample size of 12,883 patients were included. Cytology, quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or both were performed in 35; 21 and 8 studies, respectively. Meta analyses revealed free intraperitoneal tumor cells (FITC) to be associated with poor overall survival in univariate (HR 3.27; 95% CI 2.82 - 3.78]) and multivariate (HR 2.45; 95% CI 2.04 - 2.94) analysis and poor peritoneal recurrence free survival in univariate (4.15; 95% CI 3.10 - 5.57) and multivariate (3.09; 95% CI 2.02 - 4.71) analysis. Subgroup analysis showed this effect to be independent of the detection method, Western or Asian origin or the time of publication.

conclusionsFITC oder positive peritoneal cytology is associated with poor survival and increased peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsHistological TechniquesHumansPeritoneumPrognosisStomach NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisTreatment Outcomefree intraperitoneal tumor cellsgastric cancerperitoneal lavageprognosis

Identifiers

PMID26384352
PMCPMC4742125
OpenAlexW2261877386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.