Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26384317›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Highly discordant serology against Trypanosoma cruzi in central Veracruz, Mexico: role of the antigen used for diagnostic.

Daniel Guzmán-Gómez, Aracely López-Monteon, María de la Soledad Lagunes-Castro, Carolina Álvarez-Martínez, Manuel Jesús Hernández-Lutzon, Eric Dumonteil, Angel Ramos-Ligonio

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Research square · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Detection ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Identification of highly conservedEmerging microbes & infections · 2024
    Article
  13. Assessment of Alinity s ChagasLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Clinical use of molecular methods forFrontiers in parasitology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Guzmán-GómezDoctorado en Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico. daguzman@uv.mx.
Aracely López-MonteonLADISER Inmunología y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Orizaba, Veracruz, Mexico. aralopez@uv.mx.
María de la Soledad Lagunes-CastroDoctorado en Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico. solagunes@gmail.com.
Carolina Álvarez-MartínezLADISER Inmunología y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Orizaba, Veracruz, Mexico. karola_5106@hotmail.com.
Manuel Jesús Hernández-LutzonLADISER Inmunología y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Orizaba, Veracruz, Mexico. manuel.365@hotmail.com.
Eric DumonteilLaboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Regionales "Dr. Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico. edumonte@tulane.edu.
Angel Ramos-LigonioLADISER Inmunología y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Orizaba, Veracruz, Mexico. angramos@uv.mx.
Universidad Veracruzana · MXAutonomous University of Yucatán · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChagas disease is a parasitic disease caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. In Mexico, the burden of the disease is difficult to estimate and improving surveillance for Chagas disease is an important priority. We aimed here at determining the seroprevalence of T. cruzi infection in humans in a rural community in Veracruz.

methodsSerum samples (196) were analyzed for T. cruzi infection using five enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests: two in-house tests based on crude parasite extract and three commercial ELISA kits. Because of highly discordant results, we further explored the importance of parasite antigens and strains by western-blot analysis.

resultsA total of 74 samples (37.7 %) were reactive with at least one ELISA, but discordance among tests was very high. The best agreement was between Chagatest recombinant and Chagatek ELISA (Kappa index = 0.798). The agreement between other combinations of tests ranged from 0.038 to 0.518. Discordant samples were confirmed by western-blot analysis using up to nine parasite strains, giving a seroprevalence of 33.7 %.

conclusionsCommercial tests had a very limited ability to detect T. cruzi infection in the study population. In-house tests based on crude parasite antigens showed a greater sensitivity but were still unable to detect all cases of T. cruzi infection, even when based on a local parasite strain. The high seroprevalence confirmed the hyper-endemicity of T. cruzi infection in the region. Reliable epidemiological surveillance of Chagas disease will require the development of improved diagnostic tests.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanBlotting, WesternChagas DiseaseEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansMexicoRural PopulationSensitivity and SpecificitySeroepidemiologic StudiesSerologic TestsTrypanosoma cruziAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID26384317
PMCPMC4573690
OpenAlexW1832367317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.