Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26383703›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2015

The attentive brain: insights from developmental cognitive neuroscience.

Dima Amso, Gaia Scerif

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed
23.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed, 341 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Competitive Cortical Prioritization Emerges for Trained Objects across the First Year of Life.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dima AmsoDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic &Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.
Gaia ScerifDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

The neural basis of sequential control in human and non-human primatesP20GM103645 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WORDEN, MICHAEL S · 2013 to 2022
$22.9M
Role of Experience in Development of Cognitive Control and Frontal CortexR01MH099078 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI AMSO, DIMA, BADRE, DAVID · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103645NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103645NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH099078Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual attention functions as a filter to select environmental information for learning and memory, making it the first step in the eventual cascade of thought and action systems. Here, we review studies of typical and atypical visual attention development and explain how they offer insights into the mechanisms of adult visual attention. We detail interactions between visual processing and visual attention, as well as the contribution of visual attention to memory. Finally, we discuss genetic mechanisms underlying attention disorders and how attention may be modified by training.

Indexed as

Cognitive ScienceNeurosciencesAdultAttentionAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBrainChildHumansVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID26383703
PMCPMC4885514
OpenAlexW1608979225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.