Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26383545›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2015

Assessment of parental perception of malaria vaccine in Tanzania.

Idda Romore, Ali Mohamed Ali, Innocent Semali, Hassan Mshinda, Marcel Tanner, Salim Abdulla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Knowledge and acceptance of malaria vaccine among parents of under-five children of malaria endemic areas in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Idda RomoreSwiss Tropical and Public health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, Postfach, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. iromore@ihi.or.tz.
Ali Mohamed AliSwiss Tropical and Public health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, Postfach, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. aali@ihi.or.tz.
Innocent SemaliMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Science (MUHAS), P.O. Box 65015, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. innosemali@yahoo.com.
Hassan MshindaCommision for Science and Technology (COSTEC), P.O. Box 4302, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. hmshinda@costec.or.tz.
Marcel TannerSwiss Tropical and Public health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, Postfach, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. marcel.tanner@unibas.ch.
Salim AbdullaIfakara Health Institute (IHI), P.O. Box 78373, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. sabdulla@ihi.or.tz.
University of Basel · CHIfakara Health Institute · TZMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZTanzania Commission for Science and Technology · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical trials of the RTS,S malaria vaccine have completed Phase III and the vaccine is on track for registration. Before making decisions about implementation, it is essential to prepare the ground for introducing the vaccine by assessing awareness and willingness to use malaria vaccines and to provide policy makers with evidence-based information on the best strategies to engage communities to manage the introduction of malaria vaccine in Tanzania.

methodsIn November 2011, as part of a large cross-sectional study of all 23 regions of Tanzania (mainland Tanzania and Zanzibar) was conducted during Tanzanian Integrated Measles Campaign (IMC) survey. In this study, the variables of interests were awareness and willingness to use a malaria vaccine. The main outcome measure was willingness to use a malaria vaccine. Logistic regression was used to examine the influence of predictive factors.

resultsA representative sample of 5502 (out of 6210) women, aged 18 years or older and with children under 11 months old, was selected to participate, using random sampling probability. Awareness of the forthcoming malaria vaccine, 11.8 % of participants in mainland Tanzania responded affirmatively, compared to 3.4 % in Zanzibar (p value <0.0001). 94.5 % of all respondents were willing to vaccinate their children against malaria, with a slight difference between mainland Tanzania (94.3 %) and Zanzibar (96.8 %) (p value = 0.0167).

conclusionsAlthough mothers had low awareness and high willingness to use malaria vaccine, still availability of malaria vaccine RTS,S will compliment other existing malaria interventions and it will be implemented through the Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals (IVB) programme (formerly EPI). The information generated from this study can aid policy makers in planning and setting priorities for introducing and implementing the malaria vaccine.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMalaria VaccinesPerceptionAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth CommunicationHumansLogistic ModelsMass VaccinationMiddle AgedTanzaniaYoung AdultMalaria Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID26383545
PMCPMC4573291
OpenAlexW2139644114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.