Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26383529›Full record

ReviewInvestigational new drugs2015

Blinatumomab for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Jason B Kaplan, Marina Grischenko, Francis J Giles

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Investigational new drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. T-Cell-Dependent Bispecific IgGs Protect Aged Mice From Lethal SARS-CoV-2 Infection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason B KaplanRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, 233 E. Superior St., First floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. jason.kaplan@northwestern.edu.
Marina GrischenkoDivision of Hematology and Oncology and Northwestern Medicine Developmental Therapeutics Institute (NMDTI), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Francis J GilesRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, 233 E. Superior St., First floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Northwestern Medicine · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a potentially fatal disease that involves clonal expansion of early lymphoid progenitor cells. Much of drug development for ALL treatment involves targeting antigens of the clonal cell surface. Blinatumomab belongs to an emerging class of anti-cancer therapeutics referred to as bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies. The Food and Drug Administration approved its use in relapsed or refractory adult Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor ALL in December of 2014. MECHANISM OF ACTION AND PHARMACODYNAMICS: Blinatumomab contains both an anti-CD3 and anti-CD19 arm, allowing for the juxtaposition of CD3+ T-cells to malignant CD19+ B-cells, thereby resulting in granzyme- and perforin-mediated B-cell apoptosis. PRECLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY: Preclinical studies suggest that blinatumomab's efficacy is related to the effector-to-target ratio and to the difference between its affinity for CD19 and CD3. PHARMACOKINETICS AND METABOLISM: Preclinical and early phase clinical studies have allowed for the characterization of the pharmacokinetics of blinatumomab, including the determination of its short half-life. The metabolic pathway has not been fully characterized but is thought to be similar to that of other antibodies. CLINICAL STUDIES: Phase I and II studies led to the identification of an ideal stepwise dose, involving long-term continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI), to optimize its efficacy and reduce the risk of certain toxicities. A high remission rate and duration were noted among a relapsed/refractory population of patients. SAFETY: The results of clinical trials have identified cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity, among others, as serious drug-related toxicities, leading to the institution of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsBlinatumomab represents a significant addition to the treatment options for ALL, but it is not without its limitations, of which are its short-half life, necessitating long-term CIVI, and the eventual emergence of CD19-negative clones. Continual development of the agent involves assessing its role in the frontline setting and in combination with chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials as TopicHumansPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAntibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic AgentsblinatumomabAcute lymphoblastic leukemiaBispecific T-cell engagerBlinatumomabCD19Targeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID26383529
OpenAlexW1656760840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.