Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26383226›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in biotechnology2016

Human cell lines for biopharmaceutical manufacturing: history, status, and future perspectives.

Jennifer Dumont, Don Euwart, Baisong Mei, Scott Estes, Rashmi Kshirsagar

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 197 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
197citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

197 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 463 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Production of isotope-labeled nanobody KN035 inMagnetic resonance letters · 2026
    Article
  8. Recombinant Protein Drugs: A 2025 Update.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Pharmaceutics · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparative Analysis of HEK293 Genomic Variability.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Highly efficient production of HIV-1Journal of virology · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

137 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer Dumonta Biogen , Cambridge , MA , USA.
Don Euwarta Biogen , Cambridge , MA , USA.
Baisong Meia Biogen , Cambridge , MA , USA.
Scott Estesa Biogen , Cambridge , MA , USA.
Rashmi Kshirsagara Biogen , Cambridge , MA , USA.
Biogen (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biotherapeutic proteins represent a mainstay of treatment for a multitude of conditions, for example, autoimmune disorders, hematologic disorders, hormonal dysregulation, cancers, infectious diseases and genetic disorders. The technologies behind their production have changed substantially since biotherapeutic proteins were first approved in the 1980s. Although most biotherapeutic proteins developed to date have been produced using the mammalian Chinese hamster ovary and murine myeloma (NS0, Sp2/0) cell lines, there has been a recent shift toward the use of human cell lines. One of the most important advantages of using human cell lines for protein production is the greater likelihood that the resulting recombinant protein will bear post-translational modifications (PTMs) that are consistent with those seen on endogenous human proteins. Although other mammalian cell lines can produce PTMs similar to human cells, they also produce non-human PTMs, such as galactose-α1,3-galactose and N-glycolylneuraminic acid, which are potentially immunogenic. In addition, human cell lines are grown easily in a serum-free suspension culture, reproduce rapidly and have efficient protein production. A possible disadvantage of using human cell lines is the potential for human-specific viral contamination, although this risk can be mitigated with multiple viral inactivation or clearance steps. In addition, while human cell lines are currently widely used for biopharmaceutical research, vaccine production and production of some licensed protein therapeutics, there is a relative paucity of clinical experience with human cell lines because they have only recently begun to be used for the manufacture of proteins (compared with other types of cell lines). With additional research investment, human cell lines may be further optimized for routine commercial production of a broader range of biotherapeutic proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological ProductsCell LineHumansMetabolic EngineeringProteinsBiological ProductsProteinsCell cultureclotting factorglycosylationHEK 293immunogenicitymonoclonal antibodypost-translational modificationrecombinant proteintherapeutic glycoproteinvaccine

Identifiers

PMID26383226
PMCPMC5152558
OpenAlexW1915519529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.