Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26383168›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical engineering & technology2015

Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda.

Roger C L Feneley, Ian B Hopley, Peter N T Wells

Erratum issued 4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical engineering & technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 123 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03621514 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

The Feasibility and Advantages of Painless Indwelling Catheter in Uniportal Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy of Lung Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorXueying YangRan2018 to 2019Enrolled200ConditionsUrethral Catheter, ComplicationsArmspainless indwelling catheter, indwelling catheter
NCT05714488 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Study: A Prospective Evaluation of the Blue Halo BioMedical, LLC "Blue Halo Coil Catheter" for Patients With Prostatic Obstruction

TypeinterventionalSponsorBlue Halo Biomedical, LLCRan2022 to 2024Enrolled95ConditionsUrinary RetentionArmsblue halo coil catheter
NCT06561737 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Video-Based Teaching on Urinary Catheterization Skills: Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorOrdu UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled112ConditionsNursing CariesArmsVideo
NCT06815120 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Two Single Arm, Multicentre Unblinded First-in-human Trials Investigating a Novel Ureteric Stent to Determine the Reduction of Encrustation, Biofilm Deposition and Complications Compared to a Conventional JJ Stent

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SouthamptonRan2025 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsCatheter Blockage, Oncology, Kidney StoneArmsExperimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B), Qualitative interview
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 322 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy of Open-Ended Urinary Catheters in Preventing Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Draining Urinary Sediments Through Conventional Eyelet Catheters and New Intermittent Micro-Hole Zone Catheters.Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The unique Efg1 fungal virulence regulon in the catheterized bladder environment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Phase-Dependent MoSInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fabrication of bioprints self-coated with thermally sensitive lactobacilli for CAUTI applications.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Smart Catheters for Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Therapy.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roger C L Feneleya North Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Southmead Hospital , Southmead Road , Bristol BS10 5NB , UK .
Ian B Hopleyb Alternative Urological Catheter Systems Ltd, Bramford House , 23 Westfield Park , Bristol BS6 6LT , UK , and.
Peter N T Wellsc Cardiff University, School of Engineering , Queen's Buildings , The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA , UK.
Cardiff University · GBSouthmead Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For more than 3500 years, urinary catheters have been used to drain the bladder when it fails to empty. For people with impaired bladder function and for whom the method is feasible, clean intermittent self-catheterization is the optimal procedure. For those who require an indwelling catheter, whether short- or long-term, the self-retaining Foley catheter is invariably used, as it has been since its introduction nearly 80 years ago, despite the fact that this catheter can cause bacterial colonization, recurrent and chronic infections, bladder stones and septicaemia, damage to the kidneys, the bladder and the urethra, and contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance. In terms of medical, social and economic resources, the burden of urinary retention and incontinence, aggravated by the use of the Foley catheter, is huge. In the UK, the harm resulting from the use of the Foley catheter costs the National Health Service between £1.0-2.5 billion and accounts for ∼2100 deaths per year. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of an alternative indwelling catheter system. The research agenda is for the new catheter to be easy and safe to insert, either urethrally or suprapubically, to be retained reliably in the bladder and to be withdrawn easily and safely when necessary, to mimic natural physiology by filling at low pressure and emptying completely without damage to the bladder, and to have control mechanisms appropriate for all users.

Indexed as

Urinary CatheterizationUrinary CathetersCatheter-Related InfectionsHistory, 16th CenturyHistory, 17th CenturyHistory, 18th CenturyHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHistory, AncientHistory, MedievalHumansadverse eventsbiomaterialsinfectionresearch agendaUrinary catheters

Identifiers

PMID26383168
PMCPMC4673556
OpenAlexW2163634558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.