Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26383081›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2015

End of life care interventions for people with dementia in care homes: addressing uncertainty within a framework for service delivery and evaluation.

Claire Goodman, Katherine Froggatt, Sarah Amador, Elspeth Mathie, Andrea Mayrhofer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Palliative Care in Early Dementia.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claire GoodmanCentre for Research in Primary and Community Care University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK. c.goodman@herts.ac.uk.
Katherine FroggattInternational Observatory on End of Life Care University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK. k.froggatt@lancaster.ac.uk.
Sarah AmadorMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department University College London, London, UK. s.amador@ucl.ac.uk.
Elspeth MathieCentre for Research in Primary and Community Care University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK. e.j.mathie@herts.ac.uk.
Andrea MayrhoferCentre for Research in Primary and Community Care University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK. a.mayrhofer@herts.ac.uk.
University of Hertfordshire · GBLancaster University · GBMarie Curie · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0611-20005Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-U
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been an increase in research on improving end of life (EoL) care for older people with dementia in care homes. Findings consistently demonstrate improvements in practitioner confidence and knowledge, but comparisons are either with usual care or not made. This paper draws on findings from three studies to develop a framework for understanding the essential dimensions of end of life care delivery in long-term care settings for people with dementia.

methodsThe data from three studies on EoL care in care homes: (i) EVIDEM EoL, (ii) EPOCH, and (iii) TTT EoL were used to inform the development of the framework. All used mixed method designs and two had an intervention designed to improve how care home staff provided end of life care. The EVIDEM EoL and EPOCH studies tracked the care of older people in care homes over a period of 12 months. The TTT study collected resource use data of care home residents for three months, and surveyed decedents' notes for ten months,

resultsAcross the three studies, 29 care homes, 528 residents, 205 care home staff, and 44 visiting health care professionals participated. Analysis of showed that end of life interventions for people with dementia were characterised by uncertainty in three key areas; what treatment is the 'right' treatment, who should do what and when, and in which setting EoL care should be delivered and by whom? These uncertainties are conceptualised as Treatment uncertainty, Relational uncertainty and Service uncertainty. This paper proposes an emergent framework to inform the development and evaluation of EoL care interventions in care homes.

conclusionFor people with dementia living and dying in care homes, EoL interventions need to provide strategies that can accommodate or "hold" the inevitable and often unresolvable uncertainties of providing and receiving care in these settings.

Indexed as

UncertaintyDementiaHumansSkilled Nursing FacilitiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID26383081
PMCPMC4574222
OpenAlexW2133598027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.