ArticleBMC palliative care2015
End of life care interventions for people with dementia in care homes: addressing uncertainty within a framework for service delivery and evaluation.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Palliative Care in Early Dementia.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic review of conceptual and theoretical frameworks used in palliative care and end-of-life care research studies.Palliative medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Managing clinical uncertainty in older people towards the end of life: a systematic review of person-centred tools.BMC palliative care · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Development and Validation of the End-of-Life Assessment Tool for Advanced Dementia: A Multi Method Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- 'I don't think they really link together, do they?' An ethnography of multi-professional involvement in advance care planning in nursing homes.Age and ageing · 2023Article
- Experiences of hospice dementia care: A qualitative study of bereaved carers and hospice clinicians.PloS one · 2023Article
- A UK qualitative study of living and dying with dementia in the last year of life.Palliative care and social practice · 2022Article
- Preferences and priorities to manage clinical uncertainty for older people with frailty and multimorbidity: a discrete choice experiment and stakeholder consultations.BMC geriatrics · 2021Observational
- Care homes, their communities, and resilience in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic: interim findings from a qualitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Palliative Care Symptoms, Outcomes, and Interventions for Chronic Advanced Patients in Spanish Nursing Homes with and without Dementia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Social networks, social capital and end-of-life care for people with dementia: a realist review.BMJ open · 2019Review
- What enables good end of life care for people with dementia? A multi-method qualitative study with key stakeholders.BMC geriatrics · 2018Article
- Meaningful connections in dementia end of life care in long term care homes.BMC psychiatry · 2018Article
- Living and dying with advanced dementia: A prospective cohort study of symptoms, service use and care at the end of life.Palliative medicine · 2018Article
- Dying comfortably in very old age with or without dementia in different care settings - a representative "older old" population study.BMC geriatrics · 2017Article
- Do cancer patients with dementia receive less aggressive treatment in end-of-life care? A nationwide population-based cohort study.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Palliative care for people with dementia in the terminal phase: a mixed-methods qualitative study to inform service development.BMC palliative care · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere has been an increase in research on improving end of life (EoL) care for older people with dementia in care homes. Findings consistently demonstrate improvements in practitioner confidence and knowledge, but comparisons are either with usual care or not made. This paper draws on findings from three studies to develop a framework for understanding the essential dimensions of end of life care delivery in long-term care settings for people with dementia.
methodsThe data from three studies on EoL care in care homes: (i) EVIDEM EoL, (ii) EPOCH, and (iii) TTT EoL were used to inform the development of the framework. All used mixed method designs and two had an intervention designed to improve how care home staff provided end of life care. The EVIDEM EoL and EPOCH studies tracked the care of older people in care homes over a period of 12 months. The TTT study collected resource use data of care home residents for three months, and surveyed decedents' notes for ten months,
resultsAcross the three studies, 29 care homes, 528 residents, 205 care home staff, and 44 visiting health care professionals participated. Analysis of showed that end of life interventions for people with dementia were characterised by uncertainty in three key areas; what treatment is the 'right' treatment, who should do what and when, and in which setting EoL care should be delivered and by whom? These uncertainties are conceptualised as Treatment uncertainty, Relational uncertainty and Service uncertainty. This paper proposes an emergent framework to inform the development and evaluation of EoL care interventions in care homes.
conclusionFor people with dementia living and dying in care homes, EoL interventions need to provide strategies that can accommodate or "hold" the inevitable and often unresolvable uncertainties of providing and receiving care in these settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.