Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26382998›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2015

Oxygen saturation targets in infants with bronchiolitis (BIDS): a double-blind, randomised, equivalence trial.

Steve Cunningham, Aryelly Rodriguez, Tim Adams, Kathleen A Boyd, Isabella Butcher, Beth Enderby, Morag MacLean, Jonathan McCormick, James Y Paton, Fiona Wee and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Australasian Bronchiolitis Guideline: 2025 Update.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Steve CunninghamDepartment of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: steve.cunningham@nhs.net.
Aryelly RodriguezCentre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Tim AdamsDepartment of Paediatrics, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, UK.
Kathleen A BoydHealth Economics & Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Isabella ButcherCentre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Beth EnderbyThe Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK.
Morag MacLeanEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jonathan McCormickDepartment of Paediatrics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
James Y PatonSchool of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Fiona WeeEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Huw ThomasDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Bristol Children's Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Kay RidingDepartment of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Steve W TurnerRoyal Aberdeen Children's Hospital, Aberdeen, UK.
Chris WilliamsRoyal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK.
Emma McIntoshHealth Economics & Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Steff C LewisCentre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Bronchiolitis of Infancy Discharge Study (BIDS) group
University of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBBristol Royal Hospital for Children · GBNinewells Hospital · GBRoyal Aberdeen Children's Hospital · GBRoyal Cornwall Hospital · GBRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Crosshouse · GB

Funding

Department of Health 09/91/16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a permissive hypoxaemic target for an oxygen saturation of 90% for children with bronchiolitis, which is consistent with the WHO recommendations for targets in children with lower respiratory tract infections. No evidence exists to support this threshold. We aimed to assess whether the 90% or higher target for management of oxygen supplementation was equivalent to a normoxic 94% or higher target for infants admitted to hospital with viral bronchiolitis.

methodsWe did a parallel-group, randomised, controlled, equivalence trial of infants aged 6 weeks to 12 months of age with physician-diagnosed bronchiolitis newly admitted into eight paediatric hospital units in the UK (the Bronchiolitis of Infancy Discharge Study [BIDS]). A central computer randomly allocated (1:1) infants, in varying length blocks of four and six and without stratification, to be clipped to standard oximeters (patients treated with oxygen if pulse oxygen saturation [SpO2] <94%) or modified oximeters (displayed a measured value of 90% as 94%, therefore oxygen not given until SpO2 <90%). All parents, clinical staff, and outcome assessors were masked to allocation. The primary outcome was time to resolution of cough (prespecified equivalence limits of plus or minus 2 days) in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN28405428.

findingsBetween Oct 3, and March 30, 2012, and Oct 1, and March 29, 2013, we randomly assigned 308 infants to standard oximeters and 307 infants to modified oximeters. Cough resolved by 15·0 days (median) in both groups (95% CI for difference -1 to 2) and so oxygen thresholds were equivalent. We recorded 35 serious adverse events in 32 infants in the standard care group and 25 serious adverse events in 24 infants in the modified care group. In the standard care group, eight infants transferred to a high-dependency unit, 23 were readmitted, and one had a prolonged hospital stay. In the modified care group, 12 infants were transferred to a high-dependency unit and 12 were readmitted to hospital. Recorded adverse events did not differ significantly.

interpretationManagement of infants with bronchiolitis to an oxygen saturation target of 90% or higher is as safe and clinically effective as one of 94% or higher. Future research should assess the benefits and risks of different oxygen saturation targets in acute respiratory infection in older children, particularly in developing nations where resources are scarce.

fundingNational Institute for Health Research, Health Technology Assessment programme.

Indexed as

Bronchiolitis, ViralCoughDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfantLength of StayMaleOximetryOxygenOxygen Inhalation TherapyPartial PressureTreatment OutcomeOxygen

Identifiers

PMID26382998
PMCPMC4673090
OpenAlexW2159774234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.