Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26382583›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Entomological surveillance following a long-lasting insecticidal net universal coverage campaign in Midwestern Uganda.

M E H Helinski, A Nuwa, N Protopopoff, M Feldman, P Ojuka, D W Oguttu, T A Abeku, S Meek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M E H HelinskiMalaria Consortium, Plot 25, Upper Naguru East Rd, PO Box 8045, Kampala, Uganda. m.helinski@malariaconsortium.org.
A NuwaMalaria Consortium, Plot 25, Upper Naguru East Rd, PO Box 8045, Kampala, Uganda. a.nuwa@malariaconsortium.org.
N ProtopopoffMalaria Consortium, Plot 25, Upper Naguru East Rd, PO Box 8045, Kampala, Uganda. natacha.protopopoff@lshtm.ac.uk.
M FeldmanMalaria Consortium, Plot 25, Upper Naguru East Rd, PO Box 8045, Kampala, Uganda. mitrafeldman@gmail.com.
P OjukaVector Control Division, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 1661, Kampala, Uganda. ojpato@gmail.com.
D W OguttuVector Control Division, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 1661, Kampala, Uganda. dguttu@gmail.com.
T A AbekuMalaria Consortium, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London, EC2A 4LT, UK. t.abeku@malariaconsortium.org.
S MeekMalaria Consortium, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London, EC2A 4LT, UK. s.meek@malariaconsortium.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA universal coverage campaign (UCC) with long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) was implemented in four districts in Midwestern Uganda in 2009-2010. Entomological surveys were carried out to monitor changes in vector density, behaviour and malaria transmission following this intervention.

methodsAnopheles mosquitoes were collected using CDC light traps quarterly and human landing catch twice a year in four sites. Collections were done at baseline before the campaign and over a three-year period following the campaign. Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were performed. A subset of anophelines were molecularly identified to species, and kdr L1014S frequencies were determined.

resultsThe prevailing malaria vector in three sites was Anopheles gambiae s.l. (>97 %), with An. funestus s.l. being present in low numbers only. An. gambiae s.s. dominated (> 95 %) over An. arabiensis within A. gambiae s.l. In the remaining site, all three vector species were observed, although their relative densities varied among seasons and years. Vector densities were low in the year following the UCC but increased over time. Vector infectivity was 3.2 % at baseline and 1.8 % three years post-distribution (p = 0.001). The daily entomological inoculation rate (EIR) in 2012 varied between 0.0-0.98 for the different sites compared to a baseline EIR that was between 0.0-5.8 in 2009. There was no indication of a change in indoor feeding times, and both An. gambiae s.l. and An. funestus s.l. continued to feed primarily after midnight with vectors being active until the early morning. Kdr L1014S frequencies were already high at baseline (53-85 %) but increased significantly in all sites over time.

conclusionsThe entomological surveys indicate that there was a reduction in transmission intensity coinciding with an increase in use of LLINs and other antimalarial interventions in areas of high malaria transmission. There was no change in feeding behaviour, and human-vector contact occurred indoors and primarily after midnight constantly throughout the study. Although the study was not designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention compared to areas with no such intervention, the reduction in transmission occurred in an area with previously stable malaria, which seems to indicate a substantial contribution of the increased LLIN coverage.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringAnimalsAnophelesAntigens, ProtozoanDisease Transmission, InfectiousHumansInsecticide ResistanceInsecticide-Treated BednetsInsect ProteinsInsect VectorsMalaria, FalciparumMutant ProteinsPlasmodium falciparumUgandaAntigens, ProtozoanInsect ProteinsMutant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26382583
PMCPMC4574096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.