Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26382308›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy2015

Preoperative biliary drainage in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: identifying patients who require percutaneous drainage after failed endoscopic drainage.

Jimme K Wiggers, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Robert J Coelen, Erik A Rauws, Mark A Schattner, C Yung Nio, Karen T Brown, Mithat Gonen, Susan van Dieren, Krijn P van Lienden and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. An Unsuccessful Randomized Trial of Percutaneous vs Endoscopic Drainage of Suspected Malignant Hilar Obstruction.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Acute cholangitis withWorld journal of clinical cases · 2024
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jimme K WiggersDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas Groot KoerkampDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Robert J CoelenDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erik A RauwsDepartment of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark A SchattnerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
C Yung NioDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karen T BrownDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Mithat GonenDepartment of Statistics, Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Susan van DierenClinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Krijn P van LiendenDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter J AllenDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Marc G H BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Olivier R C BuschDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael I D'AngelicaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Robert P DeMatteoDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Dirk J GoumaDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T Peter KinghamDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
William R JarnaginDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Thomas M van GulikDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USKettering University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY

aimsPreoperative biliary drainage is often initiated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), but additional percutaneous transhepatic catheter (PTC) drainage is frequently required. This study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model to identify patients with a high risk of inadequate ERCP drainage. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with potentially resectable PHC and (attempted) preoperative ERCP drainage were included from two specialty center cohorts between 2001 and 2013. Indications for additional PTC drainage were failure to place an endoscopic stent, failure to relieve jaundice, cholangitis, or insufficient drainage of the future liver remnant. A prediction model was derived from the European cohort and externally validated in the USA cohort.

resultsOf the 288 patients, 108 (38%) required additional preoperative PTC drainage after inadequate ERCP drainage. Independent risk factors for additional PTC drainage were proximal biliary obstruction on preoperative imaging (Bismuth 3 or 4) and predrainage total bilirubin level. The prediction model identified three subgroups: patients with low risk (7%), moderate risk (40%), and high risk (62%). The high-risk group consisted of patients with a total bilirubin level above 150 µmol/L and Bismuth 3a or 4 tumors, who typically require preoperative drainage of the angulated left bile ducts. The prediction model had good discrimination (area under the curve 0.74) and adequate calibration in the external validation cohort.

conclusionsSelected patients with potentially resectable PHC have a high risk (62%) of inadequate preoperative ERCP drainage requiring additional PTC drainage. These patients might do better with initial PTC drainage instead of ERCP.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeKlatskin TumorAgedCholangitisCholestasisDrainageFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPreoperative CarePrognosisReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID26382308
PMCPMC4745253
OpenAlexW2412997467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.