Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26382218›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

High degree of mitochondrial gene heterogeneity in the bat tick species Ixodes vespertilionis, I. ariadnae and I. simplex from Eurasia.

Sándor Hornok, Agustín Estrada-Peña, Jenő Kontschán, Olivier Plantard, Bernd Kunz, Andrei D Mihalca, Adora Thabah, Snežana Tomanović, Jelena Burazerović, Nóra Takács and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. First Record ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Description ofZooKeys · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 14 institutions in 8 countries.

Sándor HornokDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Szent István University, Budapest, Hungary. hornok.sandor@aotk.szie.hu.
Agustín Estrada-PeñaDepartment of Animal Pathology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. aestrada@unizar.es.
Jenő KontschánPlant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary. jkontschan@gmail.com.
Olivier PlantardINRA, Biologie, Epidémiologie et Analyse de Risque en santé animale, Nantes, France. olivier.plantard@oniris-nantes.fr.
Bernd KunzIndependent researcher, Langenburg, Germany. libellen@berndkunz.de.
Andrei D MihalcaDepartment of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. amihalca@usamvcluj.ro.
Adora ThabahSolar View Cottage, Upper Mawprem, Shillong, Meghalaya, India. adora_thabah@yahoo.co.uk.
Snežana TomanovićLaboratory for Medical Entomology, Centre of Exellence for Food and Vector-Borne Zoonoses, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. snezanat@imi.bg.ac.rs.
Jelena BurazerovićChair of Animal Ecology and Zoogeography, Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. jelena.burazerovic@gmail.com.
Nóra TakácsDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Szent István University, Budapest, Hungary. takacs.nora@aotk.szie.hu.
Tamás GörfölDepartment of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary. gorfol.tamas@gmail.com.
Péter EstókDepartment of Zoology, Eszterházy Károly College, Eger, Hungary. batfauna@gmail.com.
Vuong Tan TuInstitute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam. tuvuongtan@gmail.com.
Krisztina SzőkeDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Szent István University, Budapest, Hungary. krisztina.sz347@gmail.com.
Isabel G Fernández de MeraSaBio. Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC, Ciudad Real, Spain. mariaisabel.garcia@uclm.es.
José de la FuenteSaBio. Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC, Ciudad Real, Spain. jose_delafuente@yahoo.com.
Mamoru TakahashiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Saitama Medical University, Iruma-gun, Japan. m.takahashi@wish.ocn.ne.jp.
Takeo YamauchiToyama Institute of Health, Imizu, Toyama, Japan. cymothoid@yahoo.co.jp.
Ai TakanoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan. a-takano@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp.
Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem · HUUniversity of Belgrade · RSCentre for Agricultural Research · HUConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESEszterhazy Karoly Catholic University · HUHungarian Academy of Sciences · HUOklahoma State University · USSaitama Medical University · JPToyama Institute of Health · JPUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversité Nantes Angers Le Mans · FRUniversity of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca · ROVietnam Academy of Science and Technology · VNYamaguchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhylogeographical studies allow precise genetic comparison of specimens, which were collected over large geographical ranges and belong to the same or closely related animal species. These methods have also been used to compare ticks of veterinary-medical importance. However, relevant data are missing in the case of ixodid ticks of bats, despite (1) the vast geographical range of both Ixodes vespertilionis and Ixodes simplex, and (2) the considerable uncertainty in their taxonomy, which is currently unresolvable by morphological clues.

methodsIn the present study 21 ticks were selected from collections or were freshly removed from bats or cave walls in six European and four Asian countries. The DNA was extracted and PCRs were performed to amplify part of the cytochrome oxidase I (COI), 16S and 12S rDNA genes, followed by sequencing for identification and molecular-phylogenetic comparison.

resultsNo morphological differences were observed between Ixodes vespertilionis specimens from Spain and from other parts of Europe, but corresponding genotypes had only 94.6 % COI sequence identity. An I. vespertilionis specimen collected in Vietnam was different both morphologically and genetically (i.e. with only 84.1 % COI sequence identity in comparison with I. vespertilionis from Europe). Two ticks (collected in Vietnam and in Japan) formed a monophyletic clade and shared morphological features with I. ariadnae, recently described and hitherto only reported in Europe. In addition, two Asiatic specimens of I. simplex were shown to differ markedly from European genotypes of the same species. Phylogenetic relationships of ticks showed similar clustering patterns with those of their associated bat host species.

conclusionsAlthough all three ixodid bat tick species evaluated in the present study appear to be widespread in Eurasia, they exhibit pronounced genetic differences. Data of this study also reflect that I. vespertilionis may represent a species complex.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsAsiaChiropteraCluster AnalysisDNA, MitochondrialDNA, RibosomalElectron Transport Complex IVEuropeIxodesMolecular Sequence DataPhylogeographyRNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, MitochondrialDNA, RibosomalElectron Transport Complex IVRNA, RibosomalRNA, ribosomal, 12SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26382218
PMCPMC4573304
OpenAlexW2096449756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.