ArticleFamily medicine2015
A Family Medicine Health Technology Strategy for Achieving the Triple Aim for US Health Care.
Article in Family medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of family doctor contract services for chronic diseases management in China: a mixed-methods systematic review.BMC primary care · 2025Pooled it
- Factors influencing the development of primary care data collection projects from electronic health records: a systematic review of the literature.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Pooled it
- Family Medicine in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: Perspectives, Directions, and Future Opportunities; A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Facilitators and barriers to chronic non-communicable disease management under family doctor contracting services in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of community-based public health service on health-related quality of life among middle-aged and older adults with chronic diseases in China.BMC public health · 2024Article
- The association between family doctor contract services and the health of middle-aged and older people in China: an instrumental variables analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effect of multiple chronic conditions on family doctor contracting in the elderly in China: the moderating role of socioeconomic status.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Development and Validation of a Model to Predict the Contract Service of Family Doctor: A National Survey in China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Effects of Family Doctor Contract Services on the Health-Related Quality of Life Among Individuals With Diabetes in China: Evidence From the CHARLS.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Family doctor contract services and health-related quality of life among patients with chronic diseases in rural China: what is the role of socioeconomic status?International journal for equity in health · 2021Article
- A Narrative Review of Factors Historically Influencing Telehealth Use across Six Medical Specialties in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- The developing family doctor system: evidence from the progress of the family doctor signing service from a longitudinal survey (2013-2016) in Pudong New Area, Shanghai.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Translating Research into Agile Development (TRIAD): Development of Electronic Health Record Tools for Primary Care Settings.Methods of information in medicine · 2019Article
- Big Data's Role in Precision Public Health.Frontiers in public health · 2018Review
- From Population Databases to Research and Informed Health Decisions and Policy.Frontiers in public health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesHealth information technology (health IT) and health technology, more broadly, offer tremendous promise for connecting, synthesizing, and sharing information critical to improving health care delivery, reducing health system costs, and achieving personal and community health. While efforts to spur adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) among US practices and hospitals have been highly successful, aspirations for effective data exchanges and translation of data into measureable improvements in health outcomes remain largely unrealized. There are shining examples of health enhancement through new technologies, and the discipline of family medicine is well poised to take advantage of these innovations to improve patient and population health. The Future of Family Medicine led to important family medicine health IT initiatives over the past decade. For example, the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) Center for Health Information Technology and the Robert Graham Center provided important leadership for informing health IT policy and standard-setting, such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services EHR incentives programs (often referred to as "meaningful use."). As we move forward, there is a need for a new and more comprehensive family medicine strategy for technology. To inform the Family Medicine for America's Health (FMAHealth) initiative, this paper explores strategies and tactics that family medicine could pursue to improve the utility of technology for primary care and to help primary care become a leader in rapid development, testing, and implementation of new technologies. These strategies were also designed with a broader stakeholder audience in mind, intending to reach beyond the work being done by FMAHealth. Specific suggestions include: a shared primary care health IT center, meaningful primary care quality measures and capacity to assess/report them, increased primary care technology research, a national family medicine registry, enhancement of family physicians' technology leadership, and championing patient-centered technology functionality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26382121PMC4926766W2405016030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.