Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26382121›Full record

ArticleFamily medicine2015

A Family Medicine Health Technology Strategy for Achieving the Triple Aim for US Health Care.

Robert L Phillips, Andrew W Bazemore, Jennifer E DeVoe, Thomas J Weida, Alex H Krist, Michael F Dulin, Frances E Biagioli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Big Data's Role in Precision Public Health.Frontiers in public health · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Robert L PhillipsThe American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY.
Andrew W Bazemore
Jennifer E DeVoe
Thomas J Weida
Alex H Krist
Michael F Dulin
Frances E Biagioli
Day Family Medicine · USAmerican Academy of Family Physicians · USCarolinas Healthcare System · USUniversity of Alabama · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Implementing Personal Health Records to Promote Evidence-Based Cancer ScreeningR01CA168795 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KRIST, ALEXANDER H · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
Integrating Patient Centered EHR and HIT Curriculum into BSS Medical EducationR25CA158571 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BIAGIOLI, FRANCES EMILY · 2012 to 2015
$1.5M
Trial of Aggregate Data Extraction for Maintenance of Certification and Raising QR21HS022583 · AHRQ · AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, INC. · PI PHILLIPS, ROBERT · 2014 to 2015
$300k
AHRQ HHS 1R21HS022583-01A1AHRQ HHS R21 HS022583NCI NIH HHS 1R25CA158571-01A1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168795NCI NIH HHS R25 CA158571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesHealth information technology (health IT) and health technology, more broadly, offer tremendous promise for connecting, synthesizing, and sharing information critical to improving health care delivery, reducing health system costs, and achieving personal and community health. While efforts to spur adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) among US practices and hospitals have been highly successful, aspirations for effective data exchanges and translation of data into measureable improvements in health outcomes remain largely unrealized. There are shining examples of health enhancement through new technologies, and the discipline of family medicine is well poised to take advantage of these innovations to improve patient and population health. The Future of Family Medicine led to important family medicine health IT initiatives over the past decade. For example, the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) Center for Health Information Technology and the Robert Graham Center provided important leadership for informing health IT policy and standard-setting, such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services EHR incentives programs (often referred to as "meaningful use."). As we move forward, there is a need for a new and more comprehensive family medicine strategy for technology. To inform the Family Medicine for America's Health (FMAHealth) initiative, this paper explores strategies and tactics that family medicine could pursue to improve the utility of technology for primary care and to help primary care become a leader in rapid development, testing, and implementation of new technologies. These strategies were also designed with a broader stakeholder audience in mind, intending to reach beyond the work being done by FMAHealth. Specific suggestions include: a shared primary care health IT center, meaningful primary care quality measures and capacity to assess/report them, increased primary care technology research, a national family medicine registry, enhancement of family physicians' technology leadership, and championing patient-centered technology functionality.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsFamily PracticeHealth Information ExchangeHumansInformation SystemsMonitoring, AmbulatoryPatient ParticipationPrimary Health CareTelemedicineUnited StatesWireless Technology

Identifiers

PMID26382121
PMCPMC4926766
OpenAlexW2405016030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.