ReviewReproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2015
Endocrine Disruptors in Domestic Animal Reproduction: A Clinical Issue?
Review in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive Insight into the Male Dog Reproductive System in Health and Diseases: Developmental, Genetic, and Environmental Factors-Review on Research and Clinical Trials.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Reproductive Effects of Endocrine Disruptors in Domestic Ruminants: Integrating In Vitro and In Vivo Evidence.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Article
- The use of induced pluripotent stem cells in domestic animals: a narrative review.BMC veterinary research · 2020Review
- The impact of bisphenol S on bovine granulosa and theca cells.Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene · 2018Article
- Evaluating the Remote Control of Programmed Cell Death, with or without a Compensatory Cell Proliferation.International journal of biological sciences · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this review was to discuss whether endocrine disruption is a clinical concern in domestic animal reproduction. To that end, we firstly summarize the phenomenon of endocrine disruption, giving examples of the agents of concern and their effects on the mammalian reproductive system. Then there is a brief overview of the literature on endocrine disruptors and domestic animal reproduction. Finally, the clinical implications of endocrine disruptors on the reproductive system of farm animals as well as in dogs and cats are discussed. It is concluded that the evidence for clinical cases of endocrine disruption by chemical pollutants is weak, whereas for phytooestrogens, it is well established. However, there is concern that particular dogs and cats may be exposed to man-made endocrine disruptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.