ArticleJournal of translational medicine2015
Genomic profiling of a Hepatocyte growth factor-dependent signature for MET-targeted therapy in glioblastoma.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of tepotinib in patients with high-grade glioma withNeuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
- Efficacy of MET-targeting CAR T cells against glioblastoma patient-derived xenograft models.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Targeted Glioma Therapy-Clinical Trials and Future Directions.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- From signalling pathways to targeted therapies: unravelling glioblastoma's secrets and harnessing two decades of progress.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Molecular targeted therapy: A new avenue in glioblastoma treatment.Oncology letters · 2023Review
- Advanced Cell Therapies for Glioblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in glioblastoma: charging the T cells to fight.Journal of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Gene mutation profile and risk stratification in AML1‑ETO‑positive acute myeloid leukemia based on next‑generation sequencing.Oncology reports · 2019Article
- MET in glioma: signaling pathways and targeted therapies.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019Review
- Differential responses of MET activations to MET kinase inhibitor and neutralizing antibody.Journal of translational medicine · 2018Article
- Investigation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and the intrinsic tumoral component of the kynurenine pathway of tryptophan metabolism in primary brain tumors.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- Characterization and structural determination of a new anti-MET function-blocking antibody with binding epitope distinct from the ligand binding domain.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Article
- Glioblastoma targeted therapy: updated approaches from recent biological insights.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2017Review
- Near infrared fluorescent imaging of brain tumor with IR780 dye incorporated phospholipid nanoparticles.Journal of translational medicine · 2017Article
- Overexpression of HGF/MET axis along with p53 inhibition induces de novo glioma formation in mice.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundConstitutive MET signaling promotes invasiveness in most primary and recurrent GBM. However, deployment of available MET-targeting agents is confounded by lack of effective biomarkers for selecting suitable patients for treatment. Because endogenous HGF overexpression often causes autocrine MET activation, and also indicates sensitivity to MET inhibitors, we investigated whether it drives the expression of distinct genes which could serve as a signature indicating vulnerability to MET-targeted therapy in GBM.
methodsInterrogation of genomic data from TCGA GBM (Student's t test, GBM patients with high and low HGF expression, p ≤ 0.00001) referenced against patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models (Student's t test, sensitive vs. insensitive models, p ≤ 0.005) was used to identify the HGF-dependent signature. Genomic analysis of GBM xenograft models using both human and mouse gene expression microarrays (Student's t test, treated vs. vehicle tumors, p ≤ 0.01) were performed to elucidate the tumor and microenvironment cross talk. A PDX model with EGFR(amp) was tested for MET activation as a mechanism of erlotinib resistance.
resultsWe identified a group of 20 genes highly associated with HGF overexpression in GBM and were up- or down-regulated only in tumors sensitive to MET inhibitor. The MET inhibitors regulate tumor (human) and host (mouse) cells within the tumor via distinct molecular processes, but overall impede tumor growth by inhibiting cell cycle progression. EGFR (amp) tumors undergo erlotinib resistance responded to a combination of MET and EGFR inhibitors.
conclusionsCombining TCGA primary tumor datasets (human) and xenograft tumor model datasets (human tumor grown in mice) using therapeutic efficacy as an endpoint may serve as a useful approach to discover and develop molecular signatures as therapeutic biomarkers for targeted therapy. The HGF dependent signature may serve as a candidate predictive signature for patient enrollment in clinical trials using MET inhibitors. Human and mouse microarrays maybe used to dissect the tumor-host interactions. Targeting MET in EGFR (amp) GBM may delay the acquired resistance developed during treatment with erlotinib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.