Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26381732›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2015

Self-administered version of the Fabry-associated pain questionnaire for adult patients.

Barbara Magg, Christoph Riegler, Silke Wiedmann, Peter Heuschmann, Claudia Sommer, Nurcan Üçeyler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. X-chromosomal inactivation patterns in women with Fabry disease.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Unexplored regulatory sequences of divergently pairedExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Barbara MaggDepartment of Neurology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. magg_b@ukw.de.
Christoph RieglerInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. christoph.riegler@web.de.
Silke WiedmannInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. wiedmann_s@ukw.de.
Peter HeuschmannInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. heuschmann_p@ukw.de.
Claudia SommerDepartment of Neurology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. sommer@uni-wuerzburg.de.
Nurcan ÜçeylerDepartment of Neurology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. ueceyler_n@ukw.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFabry-associated pain may be the first symptom of Fabry disease (FD) and presents with a unique phenotype including mostly acral burning triggerable pain attacks, evoked pain, pain crises, and permanent pain. We recently developed and validated the first Fabry Pain Questionnaire (FPQ) for adult patients. Here we report on the validation of the self-administered version of the FPQ that no longer requires a face-to-face interview but can be filled in by the patients themselves allowing more flexible data collection.

methodsAt our Würzburg Fabry Center for Interdisciplinary Treatment, Germany, we have developed the self-administered version of the FPQ by adapting the questionnaire to a self-report version. To do this, consecutive Fabry patients with current or past pain history (n = 56) were first interviewed face-to-face. Two weeks later patients' self-reported questionnaire results were collected by mail (n = 55). We validated the self-administered version of the FPQ by assessing the inter-rater reliability agreement of scores obtained by supervised administration and self-administration of the FPQ.

resultsThe FPQ contains 15 questions on the different pain phenotypes, on pain development during life with and without therapy, and on impairment due to pain. Statistical analysis showed that the majority of questions were answered in high agreement in both sessions with a mean AC1-statistic of 0.857 for 55 nominal-scaled items and a mean ICC of 0.587 for 9 scores.

conclusionsThis self-administered version of the first pain questionnaire for adult Fabry patients is a useful tool to assess Fabry-associated pain without a time-consuming face-to-face interview but via a self-reporting survey allowing more flexible usage.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCohort StudiesFabry DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26381732
PMCPMC4573689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.