Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26381350›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated transgene knockin at the H11 locus in pigs.

Jinxue Ruan, Hegang Li, Kui Xu, Tianwen Wu, Jingliang Wei, Rong Zhou, Zhiguo Liu, Yulian Mu, Shulin Yang, Hongsheng Ouyang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pig Genome Editing for Agriculture: Achievements and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Use of Genome Editing Techniques to Produce Transgenic Farm Animals.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jinxue RuanState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition &Key Laboratory for Farm Animal Genetic Resources and Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China.
Hegang LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition &Key Laboratory for Farm Animal Genetic Resources and Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China.
Kui XuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition &Key Laboratory for Farm Animal Genetic Resources and Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China.
Tianwen WuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition &Key Laboratory for Farm Animal Genetic Resources and Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China.
Jingliang WeiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition &Key Laboratory for Farm Animal Genetic Resources and Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China.
Rong ZhouState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition &Key Laboratory for Farm Animal Genetic Resources and Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China.
Zhiguo LiuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition &Key Laboratory for Farm Animal Genetic Resources and Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China.
Yulian MuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition &Key Laboratory for Farm Animal Genetic Resources and Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China.
Shulin YangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition &Key Laboratory for Farm Animal Genetic Resources and Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China.
Hongsheng OuyangJilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, College of Animal Science, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, PR China.
Ruby Yanru Chen-TsaiApplied StemCell, Inc., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Kui LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition &Key Laboratory for Farm Animal Genetic Resources and Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, PR China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNJilin University · CNApplied StemCell (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transgenic pigs play an important role in producing higher quality food in agriculture and improving human health when used as animal models for various human diseases in biomedicine. Production of transgenic pigs, however, is a lengthy and inefficient process that hinders research using pig models. Recent applications of the CRISPR/Cas9 system for generating site-specific gene knockout/knockin models, including a knockout pig model, have significantly accelerated the animal model field. However, a knockin pig model containing a site-specific transgene insertion that can be passed on to its offspring remains lacking. Here, we describe for the first time the generation of a site-specific knockin pig model using a combination of CRISPR/Cas9 and somatic cell nuclear transfer. We also report a new genomic "safe harbor" locus, named pH11, which enables stable and robust transgene expression. Our results indicate that our CRISPR/Cas9 knockin system allows highly efficient gene insertion at the pH11 locus of up to 54% using drug selection and 6% without drug selection. We successfully inserted a gene fragment larger than 9 kb at the pH11 locus using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Our data also confirm that the gene inserted into the pH11 locus is highly expressed in cells, embryos and animals.

Indexed as

Gene Knock-In TechniquesGenetic LociTransgenesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCell LineCRISPR-Cas SystemsFibroblastsGene ExpressionGene OrderGenes, ReporterGene TargetingGenetic VectorsMutagenesis, InsertionalSwine

Identifiers

PMID26381350
PMCPMC4585612
OpenAlexW2406276752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.