Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26381286›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2015

Investigation of Synaptic Tagging/Capture and Cross-capture using Acute Hippocampal Slices from Rodents.

Mahesh Shivarama Shetty, Mahima Sharma, Neo Sin Hui, Ananya Dasgupta, Suma Gopinadhan, Sreedharan Sajikumar

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Primary cilia and neural computation.Journal of biomedical science · 2026
    Review
  3. Hippocampal CA2 to CA1: A metaplastic switch for memory encoding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Synapses tagged, memories kept: synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis in brain health and disease.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Metaplastic Reinforcement of Long-Term Potentiation in Hippocampal Area CA2 by Cholinergic Receptor Activation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mahesh Shivarama ShettyDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore; Neurobiology/Aging Programme, Life Sciences Institute, National University of Singapore.
Mahima SharmaDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore; Neurobiology/Aging Programme, Life Sciences Institute, National University of Singapore.
Neo Sin HuiDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore; Neurobiology/Aging Programme, Life Sciences Institute, National University of Singapore.
Ananya DasguptaDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore; Neurobiology/Aging Programme, Life Sciences Institute, National University of Singapore.
Suma GopinadhanDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore; Neurobiology/Aging Programme, Life Sciences Institute, National University of Singapore.
Sreedharan SajikumarDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore; Neurobiology/Aging Programme, Life Sciences Institute, National University of Singapore; phssks@nus.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic tagging and capture (STC) and cross-tagging are two important mechanisms at cellular level that explain how synapse-specificity and associativity is achieved in neurons within a specific time frame. These long-term plasticity-related processes are the leading candidate models to study the basis of memory formation and persistence at the cellular level. Both STC and cross-tagging involve two serial processes: (1) setting of the synaptic tag as triggered by a specific pattern of stimulation, and (2) synaptic capture, whereby the synaptic tag interacts with newly synthesized plasticity-related proteins (PRPs). Much of the understanding about the concepts of STC and cross-tagging arises from the studies done in CA1 region of the hippocampus and because of the technical complexity many of the laboratories are still unable to study these processes. Experimental conditions for the preparation of hippocampal slices and the recording of stable late-LTP/LTD are extremely important to study synaptic tagging/cross-tagging. This video article describes the experimental procedures to study long-term plasticity processes such as STC and cross-tagging in the CA1 pyramidal neurons using stable, long-term field-potential recordings from acute hippocampal slices of rats.

Indexed as

AnimalsCA1 Region, HippocampalMaleNeuronal PlasticityPyramidal CellsRatsRats, WistarSynapses

Identifiers

PMID26381286
PMCPMC4692586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.