Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26381204›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteomics2015

mapDIA: Preprocessing and statistical analysis of quantitative proteomics data from data independent acquisition mass spectrometry.

Guoshou Teo, Sinae Kim, Chih-Chiang Tsou, Ben Collins, Anne-Claude Gingras, Alexey I Nesvizhskii, Hyungwon Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guoshou TeoDepartment of Applied Probability and Statistics, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Sinae KimDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Chih-Chiang TsouDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ben CollinsDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Anne-Claude GingrasLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alexey I NesvizhskiiDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Hyungwon ChoiSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: hyung_won_choi@nuhs.edu.sg.

Funding

COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY-BASED INTERACTOME DATAR01GM094231 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Alexey I Nesvizhskii · 2010 to 2026
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01GM94231NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledData independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry is an emerging technique that offers more complete detection and quantification of peptides and proteins across multiple samples. DIA allows fragment-level quantification, which can be considered as repeated measurements of the abundance of the corresponding peptides and proteins in the downstream statistical analysis. However, few statistical approaches are available for aggregating these complex fragment-level data into peptide- or protein-level statistical summaries. In this work, we describe a software package, mapDIA, for statistical analysis of differential protein expression using DIA fragment-level intensities. The workflow consists of three major steps: intensity normalization, peptide/fragment selection, and statistical analysis. First, mapDIA offers normalization of fragment-level intensities by total intensity sums as well as a novel alternative normalization by local intensity sums in retention time space. Second, mapDIA removes outlier observations and selects peptides/fragments that preserve the major quantitative patterns across all samples for each protein. Last, using the selected fragments and peptides, mapDIA performs model-based statistical significance analysis of protein-level differential expression between specified groups of samples. Using a comprehensive set of simulation datasets, we show that mapDIA detects differentially expressed proteins with accurate control of the false discovery rates. We also describe the analysis procedure in detail using two recently published DIA datasets generated for 14-3-3β dynamic interaction network and prostate cancer glycoproteome. AVAILABILITY: The software was written in C++ language and the source code is available for free through SourceForge website http://sourceforge.net/projects/mapdia/.This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Computational Proteomics.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalGene Expression ProfilingMass SpectrometryModels, StatisticalProtein Interaction MappingProteomeProteomicsSequence Analysis, ProteinProteomeData independent acquisitionData preprocessingDifferential expressionNormalization

Identifiers

PMID26381204
PMCPMC4630088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.