Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26381144›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Propofol Increases Host Susceptibility to Microbial Infection by Reducing Subpopulations of Mature Immune Effector Cells at Sites of Infection.

Lavanya Visvabharathy, Bobbi Xayarath, Guy Weinberg, Rebecca A Shilling, Nancy E Freitag

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sedative choice altersInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lavanya VisvabharathyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Bobbi XayarathDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Guy WeinbergDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Rebecca A ShillingDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America; Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Nancy E FreitagDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Deciphering how anesthetics increase host susceptibility to microbial infectionR03AI097160 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI FREITAG, NANCY ELIZABETH · 2012 to 2013
$146k
NIAID NIH HHS AI097160NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI097160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anesthetics are known to modulate host immune responses, but separating the variables of surgery from anesthesia when analyzing hospital acquired infections is often difficult. Here, the bacterial pathogen Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) was used to assess the impact of the common anesthetic propofol on host susceptibility to infection. Brief sedation of mice with physiologically relevant concentrations of propofol increased bacterial burdens in target organs by more than 10,000-fold relative to infected control animals. The adverse effects of propofol sedation on immune clearance of Lm persisted after recovery from sedation, as animals given the drug remained susceptible to infection for days following anesthesia. In contrast to propofol, sedation with alternative anesthetics such as ketamine/xylazine or pentobarbital did not increase susceptibility to systemic Lm infection. Propofol altered systemic cytokine and chemokine expression during infection, and prevented effective bacterial clearance by inhibiting the recruitment and/or activity of immune effector cells at sites of infection. Propofol exposure induced a marked reduction in marginal zone macrophages in the spleens of Lm infected mice, resulting in bacterial dissemination into deep tissue. Propofol also significantly increased mouse kidney abscess formation following infection with the common nosocomial pathogen Staphylococcus aureus. Taken together, these data indicate that even brief exposure to propofol severely compromises host resistance to microbial infection for days after recovery from sedation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Outbred StrainsBacterial InfectionsCell CountCells, CulturedCross InfectionDisease SusceptibilityDown-RegulationFemaleHypnotics and SedativesListeria monocytogenesListeriosisMacrophagesMicePropofolT-LymphocytesHypnotics and SedativesPropofol

Identifiers

PMID26381144
PMCPMC4575148
OpenAlexW1422487856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.