Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26380745›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2015

Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) review of a lifesaving technology.

George Makdisi, I-Wen Wang

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 256 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
256citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04853953 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Incidence of Bleeding Complications in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome on Veno-venous ECMO

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2021 to 2021Enrolled400ConditionsAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication, Corona Virus InfectionArmsIncidence of bleeding complications in ARDS patients on veno-venous ECMO
NCT06560164 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Restrictive Versus Liberal Thresholds for Red Blood Cell Transfusion in ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - the TREC Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2024 to 2028Enrolled526ConditionsTransfusion, Red Blood Cell, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, AnemiaArmsRed Blood Cell transfusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

256 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational

196 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

George MakdisiIndiana University School of Medicine & Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
I-Wen WangIndiana University School of Medicine & Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) indications and usage has strikingly progressed over the last 20 years; it has become essential tool in the care of adults and children with severe cardiac and pulmonary dysfunction refractory to conventional management. In this article we will provide a review of ECMO development, clinical indications, patients' management, options and cannulations techniques, complications, outcomes, and the appropriate strategy of organ management while on ECMO.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shockcardiopulmonary resuscitationExtra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)respiratory failure

Identifiers

PMID26380745
PMCPMC4522501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.