Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26380700›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2015

Context matters: sexual signaling loss in digital organisms.

Emily G Weigel, Nicholas D Testa, Alex Peer, Sara C Garnett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily G WeigelDepartment of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University 288 Farm Lane Road RM 203, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824 ; BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan, 48824.
Nicholas D TestaDepartment of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University 288 Farm Lane Road RM 203, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824 ; BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan, 48824.
Alex PeerDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, Wisconsin, 53706.
Sara C GarnettDepartment of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University 288 Farm Lane Road RM 203, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824 ; BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan, 48824.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual signals are important in attracting and choosing mates; however, these signals and their associated preferences are often costly and frequently lost. Despite the prevalence of signaling system loss in many taxa, the factors leading to signal loss remain poorly understood. Here, we test the hypothesis that complexity in signal loss scenarios is due to the context-dependent nature of the many factors affecting signal loss itself. Using the Avida digital life platform, we evolved 50 replicates of ∼250 lineages, each with a unique combination of parameters, including whether signaling is obligate or facultative; genetic linkage between signaling and receiving genes; population size; and strength of preference for signals. Each of these factors ostensibly plays a crucial role in signal loss, but was found to do so only under specific conditions. Under obligate signaling, genetic linkage, but not population size, influenced signal loss; under facultative signaling, genetic linkage does not have significant influence. Somewhat surprisingly, only a total loss of preference in the obligate signaling populations led to total signal loss, indicating that even a modest amount of preference is enough to maintain signaling systems. Strength of preference proved to be the strongest single force preventing signal loss, as it consistently overcame the potential effects of drift within our study. Our findings suggest that signaling loss is often dependent on not just preference for signals, population size, and genetic linkage, but also whether signals are required to initiate mating. These data provide an understanding of the factors (and their interactions) that may facilitate the maintenance of sexual signals.

Indexed as

Digital evolutiongenetic linkagemate preferencepopulation sizesexual signals

Identifiers

PMID26380700
PMCPMC4567875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.