Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26380572›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG

Unlicensed and Off-Label Drug Use in Children Before and After Pediatric Governmental Initiatives.

Jennifer Corny, Denis Lebel, Benoit Bailey, Jean-François Bussières

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Off-label use of medicines in South Africa: a review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. In the Real-World, Kids Use Medications and Devices.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2017
    Article
  19. Off-label and unlicensed medicines to hospitalised children in Norway.The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer CornyPharmacy Practice Research Unit, Pharmacy Department, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Québec, Canada;
Denis LebelPharmacy Practice Research Unit, Pharmacy Department, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Québec, Canada;
Benoit BaileyDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Québec, Canada;
Jean-François BussièresPharmacy Practice Research Unit, Pharmacy Department, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Québec, Canada; ; Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGovernmental agencies (US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency) implemented initiatives to improve pediatric clinical research, starting in 1997 and 2007, respectively. The aim of this review was to quantify the unlicensed and off-label drug uses in children before and after these implementations.

methodsLiterature review of unlicensed and off-label drug uses was performed on PubMed and Google-Scholar from 1985 to 2014. Relevant titles/abstracts were reviewed, and articles were included if evaluating unlicensed/off-label drug uses, with a clear description of health care setting and studied population. Included articles were divided into 3 groups: studies conducted in United States (before/after 2007), in Europe (before/after 2007), and in other countries.

resultsOf the 48 articles reviewed, 27 were included. Before implementation of pediatric initiatives, global unlicensed drug use rate in Europe was found to be 0.2% to 36% for inpatients and 0.3% to 16.6% for outpatients. After implementation, it marginally decreased to 11.4% and 1.26% to 6.7%, respectively. Concerning off-label drug use rates, it was found to be 18% to 66% for inpatients and 10.5% to 37.5% for outpatients before the implementation. After implementation, it decreased marginally to 33.2% to 46.5% and to 3.3% to 13.5%, respectively. In other countries, unlicensed and off-label drug use rates were found to be, respectively, 8% to 27.3% and 11% to 47%.

conclusionsGovernmental initiatives to improve clinical research conducted in children seem to have had a marginal effect to decrease the unlicensed and off-label drug uses prevalence in Europe.

Indexed as

off-label usepediatricsreview

Identifiers

PMID26380572
PMCPMC4557722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.