ReviewF1000Research2015
Engineering food crops to grow in harsh environments.
Review in F1000Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant biomarkers as early detection tools in stress management in food crops: a review.Planta · 2024Review
- Comparative transcriptome analysis suggests convergent evolution of desiccation tolerance in Selaginella species.BMC plant biology · 2020Article
- Plant Probiotic Bacterial Endophyte, Alcaligenes faecalis, Modulates Plant Growth and Forskolin Biosynthesis in Coleus forskohlii.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2020Article
- Expression Divergence as an Evolutionary Alternative Mechanism Adopted by Two Rice Subspecies Against Rice Blast Infection.Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- Article
- Determinants of stakeholders' attitudes towards biodiesel.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2017Article
- Epigenetic Inheritance and Its Role in Evolutionary Biology: Re-Evaluation and New Perspectives.Biology · 2016Article
- Digital imaging of root traits (DIRT): a high-throughput computing and collaboration platform for field-based root phenomics.Plant methods · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving sustainable agriculture and producing enough food for the increasing global population will require effective strategies to cope with harsh environments such as water and nutrient stress, high temperatures and compacted soils with high impedance that drastically reduce crop yield. Recent advances in the understanding of the molecular, cellular and epigenetic mechanisms that orchestrate plant responses to abiotic stress will serve as the platform to engineer improved crop plants with better designed root system architecture and optimized metabolism to enhance water and nutrients uptake and use efficiency and/or soil penetration. In this review we discuss such advances and how the generated knowledge could be used to integrate effective strategies to engineer crops by gene transfer or genome editing technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.