Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26380054›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2015

Laparoscopic right-sided colonic resection with transluminal colonoscopic specimen extraction.

Cuneyt Kayaalp, Koray Kutluturk, Mehmet Ali Yagci, Mustafa Ates

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04394988 (Total 102 Natural Orifice Specimen Extractions Following Laparoscopic Colorectal Resections), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04394988 completednot on this map

Total 102 Natural Orifice Specimen Extractions Following Laparoscopic Colorectal Resections

TypeobservationalSponsorInonu UniversityRan2013 to 2018Enrolled102ConditionsIncisional Hernia, Incision Infection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Cuneyt KayaalpCuneyt Kayaalp, Mehmet Ali Yagci, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Inonu University, 44280 Malatya, Turkey.
Koray KutluturkCuneyt Kayaalp, Mehmet Ali Yagci, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Inonu University, 44280 Malatya, Turkey.
Mehmet Ali YagciCuneyt Kayaalp, Mehmet Ali Yagci, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Inonu University, 44280 Malatya, Turkey.
Mustafa AtesCuneyt Kayaalp, Mehmet Ali Yagci, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Inonu University, 44280 Malatya, Turkey.
Creative Research Enterprises (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo study the transcolonic extraction of the proximally resected colonic specimens by colonoscopic assistance at laparoscopic colonic surgery.

methodsThe diagnoses of our patients were Crohn's disease, carcinoid of appendix and adenocarcinoma of cecum. We preferred laparoscopic total mesocolic resections. Colon and terminal ileum were divided with endoscopic staplers. A colonoscope was placed per anal and moved proximally in the colon till to reach the colonic closed end under the laparoscopic guidance. The stump of the colon was opened with laparoscopic scissors. A snare of colonoscope was released and the intraperitoneal complete free colonic specimen was grasped. Specimen was moved in to the colon with the help of the laparoscopic graspers and pulled gently through the large bowel and extracted through the anus. The open end of the colon was closed again and the ileal limb and the colon were anastomosed intracorporeally with a 60-mm laparoscopic stapler. The common enterotomy orifice was closed in two layers with a running intracorporeal suture.

resultsThere were three patients with laparoscopic right-sided colonic resections and their specimens were intended to remove through the remnant colon by colonoscopy but the procedure failed in one patient (adenocarcinoma) due to a bulky mass and the specimen extraction was converted to transvaginal route. All the patients had prior abdominal surgeries and had related adhesions. The operating times were 210, 300 and 500 min. The lengths of the specimens were 13, 17 and 27 cm. In our cases, there were no superficial or deep surgical site infections or any other complications. The patients were discharged uneventfully within 4-5 d and they were asymptomatic after a mean 7.6 mo follow-up (ranged 4-12). As far as we know, there were only 12 cases reported yet on transcolonic extraction of the proximal colonic specimens by colonoscopic assistance after laparoscopic resections. With our cases, success rate of the overall experience in the literature was 80% (12/15) in selected cases.

conclusionTranscolonic specimen extraction for right-sided colonic resection is feasible in selected patients. Both natural orifice surgery and intracorporeal anastomosis avoids mini-laparotomy for specimen extraction or anastomosis.

Indexed as

Colon cancerColonoscopyCrohn’s diseaseLaparoscopic surgeryNatural orifice specimen extractionNatural orifice transendoscopic surger

Identifiers

PMID26380054
PMCPMC4564835
OpenAlexW2405795596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.