ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2015
Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and pelvic floor disorders.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Modified Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2023Article
- Transanal rectopexy for external rectal prolapse.Annals of coloproctology · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic resection rectopexy significantly affects preexisting urinary symptoms in female patients.International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Observational
- Redo ventral rectopexy: is it worthwhile?Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Article
- Vaginal cuff perforation during robotic-assisted mesh recto-sacrocolpopexy.IJU case reports · 2020Article
- Surgical Treatment of Rectal Prolapse: A 10-Year Experience at a Single Institution.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2019Article
- Does Surgical Approach in Pelvic Floor Repair Impact Sexual Function in Women?Sexual medicine · 2019Article
- Comparative study of safety and efficacy of synthetic surgical glue for mesh fixation in ventral rectopexy.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Observational
- Outcome of a Modified Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse with the Use of a Single or Double Suture: A Case Series of 15 Patients.The American journal of case reports · 2017Article
- The use of laparoscopic rectopexy to manage rectal prolapse with Pseudo-Meigs' syndrome in a 64-year-old female: a case report.Clinical case reports · 2017Article
- Laparoscopic Vaginal Suspension and Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse.Annals of coloproctology · 2017Article
- Redo laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexies: a multimedia article on the technical points.Techniques in coloproctology · 2016Article
- Current Trends in Management of Defecatory Dysfunction, Posterior Compartment Prolapse, and Fecal Incontinence.Current obstetrics and gynecology reports · 2016Article
- Surgical options for full-thickness rectal prolapse: current status and institutional choice.Annals of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic floor disorders are different dysfunctions of gynaecological, urinary or anorectal organs, which can present as incontinence, outlet-obstruction and organ prolapse or as a combination of these symptoms. Pelvic floor disorders affect a substantial amount of people, predominantly women. Transabdominal procedures play a major role in the treatment of these disorders. With the development of new techniques established open procedures are now increasingly performed laparoscopically. Operation techniques consist of various rectopexies with suture, staples or meshes eventually combined with sigmoid resection. The different approaches need to be measured by their operative and functional outcome and their recurrence rates. Although these operations are performed frequently a comparison and evaluation of the different methods is difficult, as most of the used outcome measures in the available studies have not been standardised and data from randomised studies comparing these outcome measures directly are lacking. Therefore evidence based guidelines do not exist. Currently the laparoscopic approach with ventral mesh rectopexy or resection rectopexy is the two most commonly used techniques. Observational and retrospective studies show good functional results, a low rate of complications and a low recurrence rate. As high quality evidence is missing, an individualized approach is recommend for every patient considering age, individual health status and the underlying morphological and functional disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.