Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26380040›Full record

ArticleStandards in genomic sciences2015

Permanent draft genome sequence of Acidiphilium sp. JA12-A1.

Sophie R Ullrich, Anja Poehlein, Sonja Voget, Michael Hoppert, Rolf Daniel, Andreas Leimbach, Judith S Tischler, Michael Schlömann, Martin Mühling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Standards in genomic sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prokaryotic communities in the historic silver mine Reiche Zeche.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effect of Introduction of Exogenous StrainFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie R Ullrich *Institute of Biological Sciences, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Leipziger Straße 29, 09599 Freiberg, Germany.
Anja Poehlein *Genomic and Applied Microbiology & Göttingen Genomics Laboratory, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Griesebachstr. 8, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-6202
Sonja VogetGenomic and Applied Microbiology & Göttingen Genomics Laboratory, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Griesebachstr. 8, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Michael HoppertGeneral Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Rolf DanielGenomic and Applied Microbiology & Göttingen Genomics Laboratory, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Griesebachstr. 8, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Andreas LeimbachGenomic and Applied Microbiology & Göttingen Genomics Laboratory, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Griesebachstr. 8, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org.0000-0001-9077-1041
Judith S TischlerInstitute of Biological Sciences, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Leipziger Straße 29, 09599 Freiberg, Germany.
Michael SchlömannInstitute of Biological Sciences, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Leipziger Straße 29, 09599 Freiberg, Germany.
Martin MühlingInstitute of Biological Sciences, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Leipziger Straße 29, 09599 Freiberg, Germany.
TU Bergakademie Freiberg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tenacious association between strains of the heterotrophic alphaproteobacterial genus Acidiphilium and chemolithotrophic iron oxidizing bacteria has long been known. In this context the genome of the heterotroph Acidiphilium sp. JA12-A1, an isolate from an iron oxidizing mixed culture derived from a pilot plant for bioremediation of acid mine drainage, was determined with the aim to reveal metabolic properties that are fundamental for the syntrophic interaction between Acidiphilium sp. JA12-A1 and the co-occurring chemolithoautotrophic iron oxidizer. The genome sequence consists of 4.18 Mbp on 297 contigs and harbors 4015 protein-coding genes and 50 RNA genes. Additionally, the molecular and functional organization of the Acidiphilium sp. JA12-A1 draft genome was compared to those of the close relatives Acidiphilium cryptum JF-5, Acidiphilium multivorum AIU301 and Acidiphilium sp. PM DSM 24941. The comparative genome analysis underlines the close relationship between these strains and the highly similar metabolic potential supports the idea that other Acidiphilium strains play a similar role in various acid mine drainage communities. Nevertheless, in contrast to other closely related strains Acidiphilium sp. JA12-A1 may be able to take up phosphonates as an additional source of phosphor.

Indexed as

Acidiphilium sp. JA12-A1acid mine drainageacidophilic bacteriaAMDmicrobial community

Identifiers

PMID26380040
PMCPMC4571130
OpenAlexW2150478035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.