ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Caspofungin as secondary antifungal prophylaxis and subsequent maintenance antifungal prophylaxis therapy in hematological malignancy patients.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of caspofungin as secondary antifungal prophylaxis (SAP) and subsequent maintenance therapy for SAP in hematological malignancy patients.
methodsForty four patients receiving caspofungin for SAP and 43 patients not receiving any SAP agents during their subsequent chemotherapy or HSCT were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical characteristics and diagnosis were analyzed according to the diagnostic criteria for IFD.
resultsThe recurrence rate of IFD in 44 patients with caspofungin for SAP was 9.1% (4/44), which was much lower than that in 43 patients without SAP (9.1% vs 46.5%, P = 0.000). Patients with SAP had lower recurrent IFD-related mortality than that without SAP (12.5% vs 55.6%, P = 0.131). Among the 44 patients with SAP, caspofungin continued as maintenance antifungal prophylaxis therapy in 18 patients after neutropenia and oral medication became possible, while voriconazole in 14 patients and itraconazole in 12 patients. The recurrent IFD occurred in 2, 1, 1 patient respectively. There was no statistical difference in recurrence rates among different maintenance antifungal prophylaxis therapies (P = 0.922). No severe adverse events were observed during SAP treatment.
conclusionsCaspofungin is effective and safe to prevent IFD recurrence in hematological malignancy patients undergoing chemotherapy or HSCT. A subsequent maintenance antifungal prophylaxis therapy of oral voriconazole or itraconazole instead of caspofungin after caspofungin as SAP during neutropenia is as effective as caspofungin given constantly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26380020PMC4565403W2411436236What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.