ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Quantitative analysis of suspicious thyroid nodules by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Quantitative and qualitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating benign and malignant superficial enlarged lymph nodes.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Thyroid Nodules: Review of Current State and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2021Review
- Diagnostic Value of Conventional Ultrasonography Combined with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) 3 and 4 Thyroid Micronodules.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the characteristics of suspicious thyroid nodules of different pathological types on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with quantitative analysis software (Qlab).
methodsA total of 101 suspicious thyroid nodules were recruited from 90 adult patients undergoing ultrasound (US), CEUS and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNCA). The CEUS characteristics were quantitatively analyzed by investigators blind to the pathological information.
resultsIn 68 benign thyroid nodules, the proportion of single nodules was higher (54.4%) than that of miliary nodules (n = 2-4), and most of them were identical-in, slow-out and hypoenhancement as compared to adjacent normal tissues. In 17 malignant thyroid nodules, most of them were slow-in, identical-out and more hypoenhancement as compared to adjacent normal tissues on CEUS.
conclusionBenign thyroid nodules show identical-in, slow-out and hypoenhancement while malignant thyroid nodules have slow-in, identical-out and more hypoenhancement as compared to adjacent normal tissues on CEUS. Quantitative analysis of thyroid nodules on CEUS may help to identify suspicious nodules and select a proper treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26380019PMC4565402What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.