ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
A novel two-dimensional quantitative shear wave elastography for differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Lesions: A Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Shear wave elastography for solid breast masses evaluation: Quantitative measurement of mean elasticity value and elasticity ratio.European journal of radiology open · 2024Article
- Prediction model that combines with multidisciplinary analysis for clinical evaluation of malignancy risk of solid breast nodules.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Article
- Diagnostic role of shear wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses.SA journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Shear wave versus strain elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesionsTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
- Virtual Touch IQ elastography reduces unnecessary breast biopsies by applying quantitative "rule-in" and "rule-out" threshold values.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation.PloS one · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a novel quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ) in diagnosis of breast lesions.
methodsThe conventional ultrasound (US) and VTIQ images of 133 pathologically proven breast lesions in 98 patients were assessed. The breast lesions were classified by US breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category. The maximum, minimum, mean and median shear wave velocity (SWV) values on VTIQ in the lesions were obtained. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was computed.
resultsTwenty-six of 133 lesions were malignant and 107 were benign. The sensitivity and specificity for US BI-RADS assessment were 96.2% and 62.6% respectively. The SWVs in malignant lesions were all significantly higher than those in benign ones (all P < 0.001). The AUC for mean SWV value was slightly higher than AUC for maximum, minimum and median SWV values, whereas no significant differences among them were found (all P > 0.05). The cut-off value of mean SWV was 3.68 m/s, with associated sensitivity and specificity of 93.3% and 79.4% respectively.
conclusionThe novel quantitative SWE of VTIQ is helpful in differentiating breast lesions. Adding the quantitative SWE of VTIQ to the US BI-RADS assessment improves the specificity in diagnosing breast lesions without loss of sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26379886PMC4565269What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.