ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia during adjuvant treatment for cervical cancer patients: development and validation of a prediction model.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic polymorphisms and platinum-induced hematological toxicity: a systematic review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Current management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in adults: key points and new challenges: Committee of Neoplastic Supportive-Care (CONS), China Anti-Cancer Association Committee of Clinical Chemotherapy, China Anti-Cancer Association.Cancer biology & medicine · 2020Review
- Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia as a Prognostic and Predictive Marker of Outcomes in Solid-Tumor Patients.Drugs · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledAn artificial neuron network (ANN) model combining both the genetic risk factors and clinical factorsmay be effective in prediction of chemotherapy-induced adverse events. PURPOSE: To identify genetic factors and clinical factors associated with bone marrow suppression in cervical cancer patient, and to build a model for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia prediction.
methodsWe performed a genome wide association study on a cohort to identify genetic determinants. Samples were genotyped using the Axiom CHB 1.0. The primary analyses focused on the scan of 657178 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Artificial neural network were used to integrating clinical factors and genetic factors to predict the occurrence of neutropenia.
results32 variants associated with neutropenia in the patients after chemotherapy were found (P<1 × 10(-4)). During internal validation and external validation, artificial neural network performed well in predicting neutropenia with considerable accuracy, which is 88.9% and 81.7% respectively. ROC analysis had acceptable areas under the curve of 0.897 for the internal validation sample and 0.782 for the external validation sample.
conclusionNeutropenia may be associated with both genetic factors and clinical factors. Our study found that the artificial neural networks model based on the multiple risk factors jointly, can effectively predict the occurring of neutropenia, which provides some guidance before the starting of chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26379877PMC4565260W2406533341What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.