ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Microvascular invasion as a prognostic indicator in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Recurrence in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review of Contemporary Data.Current urology reports · 2017Pooled it
- UroPredict: Machine learning model on real-world data for prediction of kidney cancer recurrence (UroCCR-120).NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- A diagnostic test of three-dimensional magnetic resonance elastography imaging for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in patients with T1 stage clear cell renal carcinoma.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
- Arterial Spin Labeling MRI for Predicting Microvascular Invasion of T1 Staging Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma Preoperatively.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Differences in circulating γδ T cells in patients with primary colon cancer and relation with prognostic factors.PloS one · 2020Article
- Prognostic factors and prognostic models for renal cell carcinoma: a literature review.World journal of urology · 2018Review
- Expression of CD105 cancer stem cell marker in three subtypes of renal cell carcinoma.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2018Article
- Evaluation of microvascular invasion as a prognostic factor in the progression of non-metastatic renal cancer.Central European journal of urology · 2018Article
- A simple prognostic score system predicts the prognosis of solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma following hepatectomy.Medicine · 2016Article
- Histopathological Prognostic Factors in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Current health sciences journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microvascular invasion (MVI), an omen of potential hematogenous spread of tumor cells, has been identified as an accepted risk factor for poor prognosis in some solid tumors. But its prognostic value in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains disputable. In order to address this question rigorously, we performed a systematical review of the published literature on MVI and RCC prognosis. According to the PRISMA statement, we searched PubMed, Web of science, and Cochrane Library database and identified 33 cohort articles that met the eligibility criteria and involved 14,946 patients (48-2596 per study) in this meta-analysis. Using the random effects model, the association between MVI and four generally recognized end points were estimated, including cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). The presence of MVI was detected in 14.4% of the pathological specimens. A higher incidence of MVI was associated with some acknowledged prognostic risk factors such as higher pathological TNM stages and higher tumor grades. Statistical significance of the combined hazard ratio (HR) was detected for CSS (HR, 2.090; 95% CI, 1.530-2.857), RFS (HR = 2.749; 95% CI, 1.974-3.828), MFS (HR = 1.621; 95% CI, 1.095-2.400). However, the association between MVI and worse overall survival did not address statistical significance (HR = 1.371; 95% CI, 0.978-1.923). These findings suggest that the presence of MVI has a detrimental effect on clinicopathological features of RCC and could serve as a poor prognostic factor for patient with RCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26379872PMC4565255What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.