Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26379872›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

Microvascular invasion as a prognostic indicator in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hai Huang, Xiu-Wu Pan, Yi Huang, Dan-Feng Xu, Xin-Gang Cui, Lin Li, Yi Hong, Lu Chen, Yi Gao, Lei Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hai HuangDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai 200003, People's Republic of China.
Xiu-Wu PanDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai 200003, People's Republic of China.
Yi HuangDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai 200003, People's Republic of China.
Dan-Feng XuUrology Research Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai 200003, People's Republic of China.
Xin-Gang CuiDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University Shanghai 200438, People's Republic of China.
Lin LiDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai 200003, People's Republic of China.
Yi HongDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai 200003, People's Republic of China.
Lu ChenDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai 200003, People's Republic of China.
Yi GaoDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai 200003, People's Republic of China.
Lei YinDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai 200003, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microvascular invasion (MVI), an omen of potential hematogenous spread of tumor cells, has been identified as an accepted risk factor for poor prognosis in some solid tumors. But its prognostic value in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains disputable. In order to address this question rigorously, we performed a systematical review of the published literature on MVI and RCC prognosis. According to the PRISMA statement, we searched PubMed, Web of science, and Cochrane Library database and identified 33 cohort articles that met the eligibility criteria and involved 14,946 patients (48-2596 per study) in this meta-analysis. Using the random effects model, the association between MVI and four generally recognized end points were estimated, including cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). The presence of MVI was detected in 14.4% of the pathological specimens. A higher incidence of MVI was associated with some acknowledged prognostic risk factors such as higher pathological TNM stages and higher tumor grades. Statistical significance of the combined hazard ratio (HR) was detected for CSS (HR, 2.090; 95% CI, 1.530-2.857), RFS (HR = 2.749; 95% CI, 1.974-3.828), MFS (HR = 1.621; 95% CI, 1.095-2.400). However, the association between MVI and worse overall survival did not address statistical significance (HR = 1.371; 95% CI, 0.978-1.923). These findings suggest that the presence of MVI has a detrimental effect on clinicopathological features of RCC and could serve as a poor prognostic factor for patient with RCC.

Indexed as

meta-analysisMicrovascular invasionprognosisrenal cell carcinomasystematic review

Identifiers

PMID26379872
PMCPMC4565255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.