ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism is not associated with breast cancer in Chinese.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA number of studies have been conducted to explore the association of XRCC1 polymorphisms with Breast cancer (BC) risk in Asians, but the results have been inconsistent. We therefore performed the present meta-analysis to explore the relationship in detail. MATERIALS AND
methodsReported studies were searched from 1990 to October 15, 2014 in PubMed and Wan fang Med Online. We performed a meta-analysis of 13 published case-control studies fitting our eligibility criteria. These studies involved XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms in 4984 BC cases and 5744 controls in dominant (ArgArg vs. GlnGln+ArgGln), recessive (ArgGln+ArgArg vs. GlnGln), and co-dominant (ArgArg vs. GlnGln) inheritance models. The total odds Ratio (OR) and 95% CI were calculated and analyzed by Review Manager 5.2 and STATE 12.
resultsOverall, significantly increased BC risk was observed in any genetic model (dominant model: odds ration [OR] = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.08, 1.58]; recessive model: OR = 0.63, 95% CI = [0.50, 0.81]; codominant model: OR = 2.52, 95% CI: [1.38, 4.60]) when all eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. In further stratified analyses, no association was found between Arg399Gln polymorphism and BC risk in Chinese fewer than three hereditary models.
conclusionsOur results suggest that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism may be associated with increased Breast cancer risk among Asians, except Chinese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26379833PMC4565216W2395641609What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.