Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26379819›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of MUC4 expression in cancers: evidence from meta-analysis.

Xing Huang, Xin Wang, Shi-Ming Lu, Chen Chen, Jie Wang, Yan-Yan Zheng, Bin-Hui Ren, Lin Xu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diffuse expression of MUC6 defines a distinct clinicopathological subset of pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xing HuangThe Fourth Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing, China.
Xin WangThe Fourth Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing, China.
Shi-Ming LuThe Fourth Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing, China.
Chen ChenThe Second Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing, China.
Jie WangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Cancer Research, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Cancer Research Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital Nanjing, China.
Yan-Yan ZhengJiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Cancer Research, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Cancer Research Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital Nanjing, China.
Bin-Hui RenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital Nanjing, China ; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Cancer Research, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Cancer Research Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital Nanjing, China.
Lin XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital Nanjing, China ; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Cancer Research, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Cancer Research Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital Nanjing, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucin4 (MUC4) is a secreted glycoprotein. Numerous studies had indicated that MUC4 was an attractive prognostic tumor biomarker. However, the results of different studies have been inconsistent. So we conducted this meta-analysis to explore the association between MUC4 expression and cancer prognosis. A systematically comprehensive search was performed through PubMed, EMBASE and CNKI (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure). Prognostic value of MUC4 expression in malignancy patients was evaluated by pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meanwhile, pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was appropriate for the association between MUC4 expression and clinicopathological parameters. Eighteen studies including 1,933 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Significant association was found between elevated MUC4 expression and poorer overall survival (OS) with pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 1.87 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.58-2.23, P<0.001]. Significant associations were also detected in biliary tract carcinoma (HR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.69-3.42, P<0.001), pancreatic cancer (HR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.42-2.86, P<0.001) and colorectal cancer (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.17-2.54, P=0.006). Moreover, combined odds ratio (OR) of MUC4 indicated that MUC4 overexpression was associated with tumor stage, tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis. Our results demonstrated that MUC4 may be exploited as a novel prognostic biomarker for cancer patients.

Indexed as

cancermeta-analysisMUC4mucinprognosis

Identifiers

PMID26379819
PMCPMC4565202
OpenAlexW2418643944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.