Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26379687›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2015

Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: a review.

Dylan P Harding, Manish N Raizada

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. BioprospectingFrontiers in fungal biology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Transcriptome Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  4. Field efficacy of a bioherbicide mimic (DiS-NHPest management science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Fungus-based bioherbicides on circular economy.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2023
    Review
  10. Chinee Apple (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Microbe Related Chemical Signalling and Its Application in Agriculture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Phytotoxic compounds from endophytic fungi.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dylan P HardingDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph , Guelph, ON, Canada.
Manish N RaizadaDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph , Guelph, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weeds are a nuisance in a variety of land uses. The increasing prevalence of both herbicide resistant weeds and bans on cosmetic pesticide use has created a strong impetus to develop novel strategies for controlling weeds. The application of bacteria, fungi and viruses to achieving this goal has received increasingly great attention over the last three decades. Proposed benefits to this strategy include reduced environmental impact, increased target specificity, reduced development costs compared to conventional herbicides and the identification of novel herbicidal mechanisms. This review focuses on examples from North America. Among fungi, the prominent genera to receive attention as bioherbicide candidates include Colletotrichum, Phoma, and Sclerotinia. Among bacteria, Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas share this distinction. The available reports on the application of viruses to controlling weeds are also reviewed. Focus is given to the phytotoxic mechanisms associated with bioherbicide candidates. Achieving consistent suppression of weeds in field conditions is a common challenge to this control strategy, as the efficacy of a bioherbicide candidate is generally more sensitive to environmental variation than a conventional herbicide. Common themes and lessons emerging from the available literature in regard to this challenge are presented. Additionally, future directions for this crop protection strategy are suggested.

Indexed as

bioherbicideColletotrichumherbicide resistancePhomaPseudomonasSclerotiniaturfXanthomonas

Identifiers

PMID26379687
PMCPMC4551831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.