ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015
Differential response of kabuli and desi chickpea genotypes toward inoculation with PGPR in different soils.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rhizobacteria promote plant growth via secretion of N-(3-oxooctanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone.Horticulture research · 2026Article
- Different responses of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) and rhizosphere microorganisms to application of single or mixed plant growth-promoting bacterial stains.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Growth and Yield Dynamics in Three Japanese Soybean Cultivars with Plant Growth-PromotingMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Uncovering DNA methylation landscapes to decipher evolutionary footprints of phenotypic diversity in chickpea.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024Article
- Combination of Biochar and Functional Bacteria Drives the Ecological Improvement of Saline-Alkali Soil.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Drought tolerance induction and growth promotion by indole acetic acid producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Vigna radiata.PloS one · 2022Article
- What Did We Learn From Current Progress in Heat Stress Tolerance in Plants? Can Microbes Be a Solution?Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Response of intercropped barley and fenugreek to mono- and co-inoculation with Sinorhizobium meliloti F42 and Variovorax paradoxus F310 under contrasting agroclimatic regions.Archives of microbiology · 2021Article
- Microbial Community and Function-Based Synthetic Bioinoculants: A Perspective for Sustainable Agriculture.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Contending charcoal rot disease of mungbean by employing biocontrolPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020Article
- Is the Application of Plant Probiotic Bacterial Consortia Always Beneficial for Plants? Exploring Synergies between Rhizobial and Non-Rhizobial Bacteria and Their Effects on Agro-Economically Valuable Crops.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- The response of mesophyll conductance to short- and long-term environmental conditions in chickpea genotypes.AoB PLANTS · 2019Article
- Changes in Leaf Anatomical Traits Enhanced Photosynthetic Activity of Soybean Grown in Hydroponics with Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Article
- Article
- Biocontrol of Bacterial Leaf Blight of Rice and Profiling of Secondary Metabolites Produced by RhizosphericFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pakistan is among top three chickpea producing countries but the crop is usually grown on marginal lands without irrigation and fertilizer application which significantly hampers its yield. Soil fertility and inoculation with beneficial rhizobacteria play a key role in nodulation and yield of legumes. Four kabuli and six desi chickpea genotypes were, therefore, evaluated for inoculation response with IAA-producing Ochrobactrum ciceri Ca-34(T) and nitrogen fixing Mesorhizobium ciceri TAL-1148 in single and co-inoculation in two soils. The soil type 1 was previously unplanted marginal soil having low organic matter, P and N contents compared to soil type 2 which was a fertile routinely legume-cultivated soil. The effect of soil fertility status was pronounced and fertile soil on average, produced 31% more nodules, 62% more biomass and 111% grain yield than marginal soil. Inoculation either with O. ciceri alone or its co-inoculation with M. ciceri produced on average higher nodules (42%), biomass (31%), grains yield (64%) and harvest index (72%) in both chickpea genotypes over non-inoculated controls in both soils. Soil 1 showed maximum relative effectiveness of Ca-34(T) inoculation for kabuli genotypes while soil 2 showed for desi genotypes except B8/02. Desi genotype B8/02 in soil type 1 and Pb-2008 in soil type 2 showed significant yield increase as compared to respective un-inoculated controls. Across bacterial inoculation treatments, grain yield was positively correlated to growth and yield contributing parameters (r = 0.294(*) to 0.838(***) for desi and r = 0.388(*) to 0.857(**) for kabuli). PCA and CAT-PCA analyses clearly showed a site-specific response of genotype x bacterial inoculation. Furthermore, the inoculated bacterial strains were able to persist in the rhizosphere showing colonization on root and within nodules. Present study shows that plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculation should be integrated with national chickpea breading program in Pakistan especially for marginal soils. Furthermore, the study shows the potential of phytohormone producing strain Ca-34(T) as promising candidate for development of biofertilizer alongwith nodulating strains to get sustainable yield of kabuli and desi chickpea with minimum inputs at marginal land.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.