Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26379638›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Differential response of kabuli and desi chickpea genotypes toward inoculation with PGPR in different soils.

Asma Imran, Muhammad S Mirza, Tariq M Shah, Kauser A Malik, Fauzia Y Hafeez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Uncovering DNA methylation landscapes to decipher evolutionary footprints of phenotypic diversity in chickpea.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Contending charcoal rot disease of mungbean by employing biocontrolPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Asma ImranNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad S MirzaNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Tariq M ShahPlant Breeding and Genetic Division, Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Kauser A MalikNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Faisalabad, Pakistan ; Department of Biological Sciences, Forman Christian College University Lahore, Pakistan.
Fauzia Y HafeezNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Faisalabad, Pakistan ; Department of Biological Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology Islamabad, Pakistan.
National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering · PKNuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pakistan is among top three chickpea producing countries but the crop is usually grown on marginal lands without irrigation and fertilizer application which significantly hampers its yield. Soil fertility and inoculation with beneficial rhizobacteria play a key role in nodulation and yield of legumes. Four kabuli and six desi chickpea genotypes were, therefore, evaluated for inoculation response with IAA-producing Ochrobactrum ciceri Ca-34(T) and nitrogen fixing Mesorhizobium ciceri TAL-1148 in single and co-inoculation in two soils. The soil type 1 was previously unplanted marginal soil having low organic matter, P and N contents compared to soil type 2 which was a fertile routinely legume-cultivated soil. The effect of soil fertility status was pronounced and fertile soil on average, produced 31% more nodules, 62% more biomass and 111% grain yield than marginal soil. Inoculation either with O. ciceri alone or its co-inoculation with M. ciceri produced on average higher nodules (42%), biomass (31%), grains yield (64%) and harvest index (72%) in both chickpea genotypes over non-inoculated controls in both soils. Soil 1 showed maximum relative effectiveness of Ca-34(T) inoculation for kabuli genotypes while soil 2 showed for desi genotypes except B8/02. Desi genotype B8/02 in soil type 1 and Pb-2008 in soil type 2 showed significant yield increase as compared to respective un-inoculated controls. Across bacterial inoculation treatments, grain yield was positively correlated to growth and yield contributing parameters (r = 0.294(*) to 0.838(***) for desi and r = 0.388(*) to 0.857(**) for kabuli). PCA and CAT-PCA analyses clearly showed a site-specific response of genotype x bacterial inoculation. Furthermore, the inoculated bacterial strains were able to persist in the rhizosphere showing colonization on root and within nodules. Present study shows that plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculation should be integrated with national chickpea breading program in Pakistan especially for marginal soils. Furthermore, the study shows the potential of phytohormone producing strain Ca-34(T) as promising candidate for development of biofertilizer alongwith nodulating strains to get sustainable yield of kabuli and desi chickpea with minimum inputs at marginal land.

Indexed as

chickpeaMesorhizobiumnodulationOchrobactrum ciceriPGPR

Identifiers

PMID26379638
PMCPMC4548240
OpenAlexW1513214838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.