Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26379561›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2015

mHealth App for Cannabis Users: Satisfaction and Perceived Usefulness.

Grégoire Monney, Louise Penzenstadler, Olivia Dupraz, Jean-François Etter, Yasser Khazaal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Perspective of Internet Poker Players on Harm-Reduction Strategies: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grégoire MonneyDepartment of Mental Health and Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals , Geneva , Switzerland ; Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva , Geneva , Switzerland.
Louise PenzenstadlerDepartment of Mental Health and Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals , Geneva , Switzerland.
Olivia DuprazFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva , Geneva , Switzerland.
Jean-François EtterFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva , Geneva , Switzerland ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Geneva , Geneva , Switzerland.
Yasser KhazaalDepartment of Mental Health and Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals , Geneva , Switzerland ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Geneva , Geneva , Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of cannabis users and their levels of satisfaction with Stop-cannabis, an app intended for cannabis users who want to stop or reduce their cannabis use or prevent relapse.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey was administered to users of Stop-cannabis, a French-language app for iOS and Android devices. All app users were invited to participate in the survey via a message sent to the app.

resultsFor hundred and eighty-two users answered the survey. The app was used daily by 348 of the participants (around 70%). More than 80% of participants (397) considered the app to have helped them "a little" or "a lot" to stop or reduce cannabis consumption. Most of the users' suggestions were related to the number or the quality of the messages sent by, or displayed in, the app.

conclusionThis pilot study supports the feasibility of such an app and its perceived usefulness. A self-selection bias, however, limits the conclusions of the study. The efficacy of the app should be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

addictionappcannabiscognitive behavior therapymhealthsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID26379561
PMCPMC4550753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.