Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26379560›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2015

Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Symptoms Following Traumatic Brain Injury.

Simarjot K Dhaliwal, Benjamin P Meek, Mandana M Modirrousta

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04760899 (Bilateral Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04760899 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Bilateral Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for the Treatment of Sports-Related Post-Concussion Syndrome (SRPCS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of IowaRan2021 to 2027Enrolled31ConditionsPost-Concussion SyndromeArmsTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Neurostimulation After Stroke.Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Traumatic brain injuries: a neuropsychological review.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation modulates theta response during a Go-NoGo task in traumatic brain injury.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simarjot K DhaliwalDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba , Winnipeg, MB , Canada.
Benjamin P MeekDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba , Winnipeg, MB , Canada.
Mandana M ModirroustaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba , Winnipeg, MB , Canada.
University of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common cause of physical, psychological, and cognitive impairment, but many current treatments for TBI are ineffective or produce adverse side effects. Non-invasive methods of brain stimulation could help ameliorate some common trauma-induced symptoms.

objectiveThis review summarizes instances in which repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) have been used to treat symptoms following a TBI. A subsequent discussion attempts to determine the value of these methods in light of their potential risks.

methodsThe research databases of PubMed/MEDLINE and PsycINFO were electronically searched using terms relevant to the use of rTMS and tDCS as a tool to decrease symptoms in the context of rehabilitation post-TBI.

resultsEight case-studies and four multi-subject reports using rTMS and six multi--subject studies using tDCS were found. Two instances of seizure are discussed.

conclusionThere is evidence that rTMS can be an effective treatment option for some post-TBI symptoms, such as depression, tinnitus, and neglect. Although the safety of this method remains uncertain, the use of rTMS in cases of mild TBI without obvious structural damage may be justified. Evidence on the effectiveness of tDCS is mixed, highlighting the need for additional investigations.

Indexed as

altered states of consciousnessdepressionnon-invasive brain stimulationrehabilitationrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationtrancranial direct current stimulationtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID26379560
PMCPMC4549551
OpenAlexW1958034468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.