Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26379436›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2015

Free radical scavenging in vitro and biological activity of diphenyl diselenide-loaded nanocapsules: DPDS-NCS antioxidant and toxicological effects.

Sílvio Terra Stefanello, Fernando Dobrachinski, Nélson Rodrigues de Carvalho, Guilherme Pires Amaral, Rômulo Pillon Barcelos, Vitor Antunes Oliveira, Cláudia Sirlene Oliveira, Camila Ferrazza Alves Giordani, Maria Ester Pereira, Oscar Endrigo Dorneles Rodrigues and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Selenium Compounds as Novel Potential Anticancer Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sílvio Terra StefanelloDepartamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Fernando DobrachinskiDepartamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Nélson Rodrigues de CarvalhoDepartamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Guilherme Pires AmaralDepartamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Rômulo Pillon BarcelosDepartamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Vitor Antunes OliveiraDepartamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Cláudia Sirlene OliveiraDepartamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Camila Ferrazza Alves GiordaniDepartamento de Química, Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Maria Ester PereiraDepartamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Oscar Endrigo Dorneles RodriguesDepartamento de Química, Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Félix Alexandre Antunes SoaresDepartamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selenium compounds, such as diphenyl diselenide (DPDS), have been shown to exhibit biological activity, including antioxidant effects. However, the use of DPDS in pharmacology is limited due to in vivo pro-oxidative effects. In addition, studies have shown that DPDS-loaded nanocapsules (DPDS-NCS) have greater bioavailability than free DPDS in mice. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to investigate the antioxidant properties of DPDS-NCS in vitro and biological activity in mice. Our in vitro results suggested that DPDS-NCS significantly reduced the production of reactive oxygen species and Fe(II)-induced lipid peroxidation (LPO) in brain. The administration of DPDS-NCS did not result in death or change the levels of endogenous reduced or oxidized glutathione after 72 hours of exposure. Moreover, ex vivo assays demonstrated that DPDS-NCS significantly decreased the LPO and reactive oxygen species levels in the brain. In addition, the highest dose of DPDS-NCS significantly reduced Fe(II)- and sodium nitroprusside-induced LPO in the brain and Fe(II)-induced LPO in the liver. Also, δ-aminolevulinate acid dehydratase within the brain was inhibited only in the highest dose of DPDS-NCS. In conclusion, our data demonstrated that DPDS-NCS exhibited low toxicity in mice and have significant antioxidant characteristics, indicating that nanoencapsulation is a safer method of DPDS administration.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzene DerivativesBrainChemical PhenomenaDose-Response Relationship, DrugFree Radical ScavengersLipid PeroxidationLiverMaleMiceNanocapsulesNitroprussideOrganoselenium CompoundsPorphobilinogen SynthaseReactive Oxygen SpeciesSelenium CompoundsBenzene DerivativesdiphenyldiselenideFree Radical ScavengersNanocapsulesNitroprussideOrganoselenium CompoundsPorphobilinogen SynthaseReactive Oxygen SpeciesSelenium CompoundsThiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substancesantioxidant propertiesdiphenyl diselenideDPDS-NCSlipid peroxidationδ-ALA-D

Identifiers

PMID26379436
PMCPMC4567224
OpenAlexW1475684093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.