Trial reportPloS one2015
Patient Empowerment Improved Perioperative Quality of Care in Cancer Patients Aged ≥ 65 Years - A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01278537 (Patient Empowerment and Risk-assessed Treatment to Improve Outcome in the Elderly After Gastrointestinal, Thoracical or Urogenital Cancer Surgery.), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Patient Empowerment and Risk-assessed Treatment to Improve Outcome in the Elderly After Gastrointestinal, Thoracical or Urogenital Cancer Surgery.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving the Theoretical Understanding Toward Patient-Driven Health Care Innovation Through Online Value Cocreation: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Identifying older adults at risk of harm following elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2018Pooled it
- On the Move to Surgery: A Scoping Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Preoperative Walking Into the Operating Theatre.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Requirements for mHealth and Augmented Reality Apps for Patient Education Regarding Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Focus Group Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Factors influencing optimal postoperative pain management: a systematic scoping review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Improving delayed discharge in gastrointestinal surgery patients: An integrative review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Review
- Evaluating the quality of online resources for patient education on robotic esophagectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- The effect of peppermint essential oil on postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain in rhinoplasty patients: a randomized clinical trial.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Patient and family engagement interventions for enhancing patient safety in the perioperative journey: a scoping review.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Association between patient activation and adherence to a colorectal enhanced recovery pathway: a prospective cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Prehabilitation: The underutilised weapon for chronic pain management.British journal of pain · 2024Article
- Colorectal cancer literacy and related factors in northeast of Iran: A cross-sectional study.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Digital Personal Health Coaching Platform for Promoting Human Papillomavirus Infection Vaccinations and Cancer Prevention: Knowledge Graph-Based Recommendation System.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Beyond the Frontline: A Triple-Line Approach of Thoracic Surgeons in Lung Cancer Management-State of the Art.Cancers · 2023Review
- Article
- Effect of multidisciplinary collaborative empowerment education on psychological distress and quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- The Impact of Preoperative Patient Education on Postoperative Pain, Opioid Use, and Psychological Outcomes: A Narrative Review.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2023Review
- Cancer literacy among Jordanian colorectal cancer survivors and informal carers: Qualitative explorations.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Knowledge, safety, and teamwork: a qualitative study on the experiences of anaesthesiologists and nurse anaesthetists working in the preanaesthesia assessment clinic.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Article
- Breaking the patientification process - through co-creation of care, using old arctic survival knowledge.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis randomized controlled, clinical prospective interventional trial was aimed at exploring the effect of patient empowerment on short- and long-term outcomes after major oncologic surgery in elderly cancer patients.
methodsThis trial was performed from February 2011 to January 2014 at two tertiary medical centers in Germany. The study included patients aged 65 years and older undergoing elective surgery for gastro-intestinal, genitourinary, and thoracic cancer. The patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group, i.e. patient empowerment through information booklet and diary keeping, or to the control group, which received standard care. Randomization was done by block randomization in blocks of four in order of enrollment. The primary outcome were 1,postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) and 2. long-term global health-related quality of life (HRQoL) one year postoperatively. HRQoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire. Secondary outcomes encompassed postoperative stress and complications. Further objectives were the identification of predictors of LOS, and HRQoL at 12 months.
resultsOverall 652 patients were included. The mean age was 72 ± 4.9 years, and the majority of patients were male (68.6%, n = 447). The ^median of postoperative length of stay was 9 days (IQR 7-14 day). There were no significant differences between the intervention and the control groups in postoperative LOS (p = 0.99) or global HRQoL after one year (women: p = 0.54, men: p = 0.94). While overall complications and major complications occurred in 74% and 24% of the cases, respectively, frequency and severity of complications did not differ significantly between the groups. Patients in the intervention group reported significantly less postoperative pain (p = 0.03) than the control group. Independent predictors for LOS were identified as severity of surgery, length of anesthesia, major postoperative complications, nutritional state, and pre-operative physical functional capacity measured by the Timed Up and Go-test by multiple robust regressions.
conclusionPatient empowerment through information booklet and diary keeping did not shorten the postoperative LOS in elderly onco-surgical patients, but improved quality of care regarding postoperative pain. Postoperative length of stay is influenced by pre-operative nutritional state, pre-operative functional impairment, severity of surgery, and length of anesthesia.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov. Identifier NCT01278537.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.