Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26378900›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2015

Strategies to Improve the Integration of Community Health Workers Into Health Care Teams: "A Little Fish in a Big Pond".

Caitlin G Allen, Cam Escoffery, Anamika Satsangi, J Nell Brownstein

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Creating a community-based comprehensive intervention to improve asthma control in a low-income, low-resourced community.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caitlin G AllenEmory University, Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30322. Email: caallen89@gmail.com.
Cam EscofferyEmory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia.
Anamika SatsangiEmory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia.
J Nell BrownsteinEmory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia.
Emory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act acknowledges the value of community health workers (CHWs) as frontline public health workers. Consequently, growing attention has been placed on promoting CHWs as legitimate partners to provide support to health care teams and patients in the prevention, management, and control of chronic disease, particularly among diverse populations and high-need individuals.

methodsUsing a mixed-methods research approach, we investigated the integration of CHWs into health care teams from the CHW perspective. We conducted a survey of 265 CHWs and interviews with 23 CHWs to better understand and describe their experience and their perceived opportunities and challenges regarding their integration within the context of health care reform.

resultsFeelings of organizational support were positively correlated with the number of CHWs in the organization. CHWs reported the following facilitators to integration: having team meetings (73.7%), training inside (70.4%) and outside of the organization (81.6%), access to electronic health records, and ability for CHWs to stay connected to the community.

conclusionThe perspectives of CHWs on their positive and negative experiences offer useful and innovative insight into ways of maximizing their impact on the health care team, patients, and their role as key emissaries between clinical services and community resources.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorPatient Care TeamSocial SupportAdultChronic DiseaseCommunity Health WorkersCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDisease ManagementEducational StatusElectronic Health RecordsEthnicityFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMale

Identifiers

PMID26378900
PMCPMC4576500
OpenAlexW1887262885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.