ArticleAmerican journal of public health2015
Practice-Based Research Priorities for Palliative Care: Results From a Research-to-Practice Consensus Workshop.
Article in American journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- International palliative care research priorities: A systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2020Pooled it
- Improving patient knowledge of palliative care: A randomized controlled intervention study.Patient education and counseling · 2017Trial
- Co-Designing End-of-Life Care for People With Pre-Existing Severe Mental Illness: Insights From Multiple Stakeholder Consultations.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- A research agenda for aging and climate change: recommendations from a research-to-practice consensus workshop.Innovation in aging · 2026Article
- Implementing palliative care education into primary care practice: a qualitative case study of the CAPACITI pilot program.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Association between the Development of Hospice and Palliative Care and Government-Funded Research Priority: Taiwan-Based Example.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Engaging and Supporting Care Partners of Persons With Dementia in Health-Care Delivery: Results From a National Consensus Conference.The Public policy and aging report · 2022Article
- Bridging the Gap Between Aging Research and Practice: A New Strategy for Enhancing the Consensus Workshop Model.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2020Article
- Nursing research priorities based on CINAHL database: A scoping review.Nursing open · 2020Article
- Awareness of Palliative Care among a Nationally Representative Sample of U.S. Adults.Journal of palliative medicine · 2019Article
- Healthcare Received in the Last Months of Life in Portugal: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Establishing a Research Agenda on Mobile Health Technologies and Later-Life Pain Using an Evidence-Based Consensus Workshop Approach.The journal of pain · 2018Article
- Improving implementation of psychological interventions to older adult patients with cancer: Convening older adults, caregivers, providers, researchers.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2018Article
- Academic Palliative Care Research in Portugal: Are We on the Right Track?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Towards a public health approach for palliative care: an action-research study focused on engaging a local community and educating teenagers.BMC palliative care · 2018Article
- Palliative Care Gaps in Providing Psychological Treatment: A Review of the Current State of Research in Multidisciplinary Palliative Care.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2018Review
- Expanding palliative care's reach in the community via the elder service agency network.Annals of palliative medicine · 2017Article
- Community-based participatory research: understanding a promising approach to addressing knowledge gaps in palliative care.Annals of palliative medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We employed the research-to-practice consensus workshop (RTP; workshops held in New York City and Tompkins County, New York, in 2013) model to merge researcher and practitioner views of translational research priorities in palliative care. In the RTP approach, a diverse group of frontline providers generates a research agenda for palliative care in collaboration with researchers. We have presented the major workshop recommendations and contrasted the practice-based research priorities with those of previous consensus efforts. We uncovered notable differences and found that the RTP model can produce unique insights into research priorities. Integrating practitioner-identified needs into research priorities for palliative care can contribute to addressing palliative care more effectively as a public health issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.