Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26378822›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2015

Differences by Sexual Orientation in Expectations About Future Long-Term Care Needs Among Adults 40 to 65 Years Old.

Carrie Henning-Smith, Gilbert Gonzales, Tetyana P Shippee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Functional Limitations and Access to Long-Term Services and Supports Among Sexual Minority Older Adults.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carrie Henning-SmithAll of the authors are with the Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Gilbert GonzalesAll of the authors are with the Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Tetyana P ShippeeAll of the authors are with the Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
U.S. Health Surveys Microdata for Population Health ResearchR01HD046697 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Julia AR Drew, Andrew Fenelon · 2004 to 2026
$13.7M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)KL2TR000113 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$5.4M
Spatial Analysis CoreR24HD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI THOMAS, WENDY E · 2001 to 2016
$4.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000113NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000114NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD046697NICHD NIH HHS R01HD046697NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041023NICHD NIH HHS R24HD041023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe examined whether and how lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults between 40 and 65 years of age differ from heterosexual adults in long-term care (LTC) expectations.

methodsOur data were derived from the 2013 National Health Interview Survey. We used ordered logistic regression to compare the odds of expected future use of LTC among LGB (n = 297) and heterosexual (n = 13 120) adults. We also used logistic regression models to assess the odds of expecting to use specific sources of care. All models controlled for key socioeconomic characteristics.

resultsAlthough LGB adults had greater expectations of needing LTC in the future than their heterosexual counterparts, that association was largely explained by sociodemographic and health differences. After control for these differentials, LGB adults were less likely to expect care from family and more likely to expect to use institutional care in old age.

conclusionsLGB adults may rely more heavily than heterosexual adults on formal systems of care. As the older population continues to diversify, nursing homes and assisted living facilities should work to ensure safety and culturally sensitive best practices for older LGB groups.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFamilyFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLong-Term CareMaleMiddle AgedSexualitySocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID26378822
PMCPMC4605153
OpenAlexW1893808226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.