Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26378582›Full record

ReviewCells2015

Nephron Patterning: Lessons from Xenopus, Zebrafish, and Mouse Studies.

Audrey Desgrange, Silvia Cereghini

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Principles of Zebrafish Nephron Segment Development.Journal of developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Biomedicines · 2022
    Article
  20. Biomedicines · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Audrey DesgrangeSorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, IBPS-UMR7622, Paris F-75005, France. audrey.desgrange@upmc.fr.
Silvia CereghiniSorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, IBPS-UMR7622, Paris F-75005, France. silvia.cereghini@upmc.fr.
Inserm · FRInstitut de Biologie Paris-Seine · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nephron is the basic structural and functional unit of the vertebrate kidney. To ensure kidney functions, the nephrons possess a highly segmental organization where each segment is specialized for the secretion and reabsorption of particular solutes. During embryogenesis, nephron progenitors undergo a mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) and acquire different segment-specific cell fates along the proximo-distal axis of the nephron. Even if the morphological changes occurring during nephrogenesis are characterized, the regulatory networks driving nephron segmentation are still poorly understood. Interestingly, several studies have shown that the pronephric nephrons in Xenopus and zebrafish are segmented in a similar fashion as the mouse metanephric nephrons. Here we review functional and molecular aspects of nephron segmentation with a particular interest on the signaling molecules and transcription factors recently implicated in kidney development in these three different vertebrate model organisms. A complete understanding of the mechanisms underlying nephrogenesis in different model organisms will provide novel insights on the etiology of several human renal diseases.

Indexed as

metanephrosnephron segmentationpronephrosregulatory networksvertebrates

Identifiers

PMID26378582
PMCPMC4588047
OpenAlexW1546093545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.