Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26378456›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The Genomic Basis of Postponed Senescence in Drosophila melanogaster.

Megan Ulmer Carnes, Terry Campbell, Wen Huang, Daniel G Butler, Mary Anna Carbone, Laura H Duncan, Sasha V Harbajan, Edward M King, Kara R Peterson, Alexander Weitzel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dynamic Changes in Gene Expression Through Aging inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Natural alleles at theProceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megan Ulmer CarnesDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America.
Terry CampbellDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America.
Wen HuangDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America; Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America.
Daniel G ButlerDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America.
Mary Anna CarboneDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America; Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America; W. M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America.
Laura H DuncanDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America.
Sasha V HarbajanDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America.
Edward M KingDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America.
Kara R PetersonDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America.
Alexander WeitzelDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America.
Shanshan ZhouDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America; Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America; W. M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America.
Trudy F C MackayDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America; Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America; W. M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, United States of America.
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI IN DROSOPHILAR01GM045146 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI ANHOLT, ROBERT R. H, MACKAY, TRUDY F. · 1991 to 2012
$5.1M
Systems Genetics of Drosophila Life SpanR01AG043490 · NIA · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI ANHOLT, ROBERT R. H, CARBONE, MARY ANNA · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043490NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM045146NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM45146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural populations harbor considerable genetic variation for lifespan. While evolutionary theory provides general explanations for the existence of this variation, our knowledge of the genes harboring naturally occurring polymorphisms affecting lifespan is limited. Here, we assessed the genetic divergence between five Drosophila melanogaster lines selected for postponed senescence for over 170 generations (O lines) and five lines from the same base population maintained at a two week generation interval for over 850 generations (B lines). On average, O lines live 70% longer than B lines, are more productive at all ages, and have delayed senescence for other traits than reproduction. We performed population sequencing of pools of individuals from all B and O lines and identified 6,394 genetically divergent variants in or near 1,928 genes at a false discovery rate of 0.068. A 2.6 Mb region at the tip of the X chromosome contained many variants fixed for alternative alleles in the two populations, suggestive of a hard selective sweep. We also assessed genome wide gene expression of O and B lines at one and five weeks of age using RNA sequencing and identified genes with significant (false discovery rate < 0.05) effects on gene expression with age, population and the age by population interaction, separately for each sex. We identified transcripts that exhibited the transcriptional signature of postponed senescence and integrated the gene expression and genetic divergence data to identify 98 (175) top candidate genes in females (males) affecting postponed senescence and increased lifespan. While several of these genes have been previously associated with Drosophila lifespan, most are novel and constitute a rich resource for future functional validation.

Indexed as

AgingAllelesAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGene ExpressionGenes, InsectGenetic VariationGenomicsLongevityMale

Identifiers

PMID26378456
PMCPMC4574564
OpenAlexW2200765636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.