Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26378204›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Automatic reconstruction of physiological gestures used in a model of birdsong production.

Santiago Boari, Yonatan Sanz Perl, Ana Amador, Daniel Margoliash, Gabriel B Mindlin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Timing of Speech in Brain and Glottis and the Feedback Delay Problem in Motor Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neural coding of sound envelope structure in songbirds.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2018
    Article
  5. From electromyographic activity to frequency modulation in zebra finch song.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Santiago BoariDepartment of Physics, FCEN, University of Buenos Aires and IFIBA, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and.
Yonatan Sanz PerlDepartment of Physics, FCEN, University of Buenos Aires and IFIBA, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and.
Ana AmadorDepartment of Physics, FCEN, University of Buenos Aires and IFIBA, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and anita@df.uba.ar.
Daniel MargoliashDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Gabriel B MindlinDepartment of Physics, FCEN, University of Buenos Aires and IFIBA, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversity of Buenos Aires · ARUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Neuromechanics of learned sensorimotor vocal integrationR01DC012859 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MARGOLIASH, DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012859NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC-012859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Highly coordinated learned behaviors are key to understanding neural processes integrating the body and the environment. Birdsong production is a widely studied example of such behavior in which numerous thoracic muscles control respiratory inspiration and expiration: the muscles of the syrinx control syringeal membrane tension, while upper vocal tract morphology controls resonances that modulate the vocal system output. All these muscles have to be coordinated in precise sequences to generate the elaborate vocalizations that characterize an individual's song. Previously we used a low-dimensional description of the biomechanics of birdsong production to investigate the associated neural codes, an approach that complements traditional spectrographic analysis. The prior study used algorithmic yet manual procedures to model singing behavior. In the present work, we present an automatic procedure to extract low-dimensional motor gestures that could predict vocal behavior. We recorded zebra finch songs and generated synthetic copies automatically, using a biomechanical model for the vocal apparatus and vocal tract. This dynamical model described song as a sequence of physiological parameters the birds control during singing. To validate this procedure, we recorded electrophysiological activity of the telencephalic nucleus HVC. HVC neurons were highly selective to the auditory presentation of the bird's own song (BOS) and gave similar selective responses to the automatically generated synthetic model of song (AUTO). Our results demonstrate meaningful dimensionality reduction in terms of physiological parameters that individual birds could actually control. Furthermore, this methodology can be extended to other vocal systems to study fine motor control.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsAnimal StructuresComputer SimulationFinchesHigh Vocal CenterNeuronsPattern Recognition, AutomatedSoundSound SpectrographyTracheaVocalization, Animalbird's own songdynamical systemsmodeling softwareperipheral vocal production modelvocal learning

Identifiers

PMID26378204
PMCPMC4737419
OpenAlexW2204730977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.