Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26378098›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2015

Modifications of Sphingolipid Content Affect Tolerance to Hemibiotrophic and Necrotrophic Pathogens by Modulating Plant Defense Responses in Arabidopsis.

Maryline Magnin-Robert, Doriane Le Bourse, Jonathan Markham, Stéphan Dorey, Christophe Clément, Fabienne Baillieul, Sandrine Dhondt-Cordelier

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Bacterial rhamnolipids and their 3-hydroxyalkanoate precursors activateProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. ThePlant direct · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maryline Magnin-RobertUnité de Recherche Vigne et Vin de Champagne Equipe d'Accueil 4707, Laboratoire Stress Défenses et Reproduction des Plantes, Structure Fédérative de Recherche Condorcet Fédération de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 3417, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, F-51687 Reims cedex 2, France (M.M.-R., S.D., C.C., F.B., S.D.-C.); andCenter for Plant Science Innovation and Department of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 (D.L.B., J.M.).
Doriane Le BourseUnité de Recherche Vigne et Vin de Champagne Equipe d'Accueil 4707, Laboratoire Stress Défenses et Reproduction des Plantes, Structure Fédérative de Recherche Condorcet Fédération de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 3417, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, F-51687 Reims cedex 2, France (M.M.-R., S.D., C.C., F.B., S.D.-C.); andCenter for Plant Science Innovation and Department of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 (D.L.B., J.M.).
Jonathan MarkhamUnité de Recherche Vigne et Vin de Champagne Equipe d'Accueil 4707, Laboratoire Stress Défenses et Reproduction des Plantes, Structure Fédérative de Recherche Condorcet Fédération de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 3417, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, F-51687 Reims cedex 2, France (M.M.-R., S.D., C.C., F.B., S.D.-C.); andCenter for Plant Science Innovation and Department of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 (D.L.B., J.M.).
Stéphan DoreyUnité de Recherche Vigne et Vin de Champagne Equipe d'Accueil 4707, Laboratoire Stress Défenses et Reproduction des Plantes, Structure Fédérative de Recherche Condorcet Fédération de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 3417, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, F-51687 Reims cedex 2, France (M.M.-R., S.D., C.C., F.B., S.D.-C.); andCenter for Plant Science Innovation and Department of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 (D.L.B., J.M.).
Christophe ClémentUnité de Recherche Vigne et Vin de Champagne Equipe d'Accueil 4707, Laboratoire Stress Défenses et Reproduction des Plantes, Structure Fédérative de Recherche Condorcet Fédération de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 3417, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, F-51687 Reims cedex 2, France (M.M.-R., S.D., C.C., F.B., S.D.-C.); andCenter for Plant Science Innovation and Department of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 (D.L.B., J.M.).
Fabienne BaillieulUnité de Recherche Vigne et Vin de Champagne Equipe d'Accueil 4707, Laboratoire Stress Défenses et Reproduction des Plantes, Structure Fédérative de Recherche Condorcet Fédération de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 3417, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, F-51687 Reims cedex 2, France (M.M.-R., S.D., C.C., F.B., S.D.-C.); andCenter for Plant Science Innovation and Department of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 (D.L.B., J.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7142-1035
Sandrine Dhondt-CordelierUnité de Recherche Vigne et Vin de Champagne Equipe d'Accueil 4707, Laboratoire Stress Défenses et Reproduction des Plantes, Structure Fédérative de Recherche Condorcet Fédération de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 3417, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, F-51687 Reims cedex 2, France (M.M.-R., S.D., C.C., F.B., S.D.-C.); andCenter for Plant Science Innovation and Department of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 (D.L.B., J.M.) sandrine.cordelier@univ-reims.fr.
Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne · FRUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sphingolipids are emerging as second messengers in programmed cell death and plant defense mechanisms. However, their role in plant defense is far from being understood, especially against necrotrophic pathogens. Sphingolipidomics and plant defense responses during pathogenic infection were evaluated in the mutant of long-chain base phosphate (LCB-P) lyase, encoded by the dihydrosphingosine-1-phosphate lyase1 (AtDPL1) gene and regulating long-chain base/LCB-P homeostasis. Atdpl1 mutants exhibit tolerance to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea but susceptibility to the hemibiotrophic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst). Here, a direct comparison of sphingolipid profiles in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) during infection with pathogens differing in lifestyles is described. In contrast to long-chain bases (dihydrosphingosine [d18:0] and 4,8-sphingadienine [d18:2]), hydroxyceramide and LCB-P (phytosphingosine-1-phosphate [t18:0-P] and 4-hydroxy-8-sphingenine-1-phosphate [t18:1-P]) levels are higher in Atdpl1-1 than in wild-type plants in response to B. cinerea. Following Pst infection, t18:0-P accumulates more strongly in Atdpl1-1 than in wild-type plants. Moreover, d18:0 and t18:0-P appear as key players in Pst- and B. cinerea-induced cell death and reactive oxygen species accumulation. Salicylic acid levels are similar in both types of plants, independent of the pathogen. In addition, salicylic acid-dependent gene expression is similar in both types of B. cinerea-infected plants but is repressed in Atdpl1-1 after treatment with Pst. Infection with both pathogens triggers higher jasmonic acid, jasmonoyl-isoleucine accumulation, and jasmonic acid-dependent gene expression in Atdpl1-1 mutants. Our results demonstrate that sphingolipids play an important role in plant defense, especially toward necrotrophic pathogens, and highlight a novel connection between the jasmonate signaling pathway, cell death, and sphingolipids.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisBotrytisCell DeathCyclopentanesIsoleucineMutationOxylipinsPlant DiseasesPlant Growth RegulatorsPseudomonas syringaeReactive Oxygen SpeciesSalicylic AcidSignal TransductionSphingolipidsSphingosine4-hydroxy-8-sphingenineCyclopentanesdihydrosphingosine 1-phosphateIsoleucinejasmonic acidjasmonoyl-isoleucineOxylipinsphytosphingosine-1-phosphatePlant Growth RegulatorsReactive Oxygen SpeciessafingolSalicylic AcidSphingolipidsSphingosine

Identifiers

PMID26378098
PMCPMC4634087
OpenAlexW2138025905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.