Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26377948›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2015

Blogging and Social Media for Mental Health Education and Advocacy: a Review for Psychiatrists.

Holly S Peek, Misty Richards, Owen Muir, Steven Richard Chan, Michael Caton, Carlene MacMillan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The WPA website: newly designed with state-of-the-art features, carrying out the mission of WPA.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Holly S PeekDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 6A, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. hpeek@partners.org.
Misty RichardsDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles, 760 Westwood Plaza, C8-193, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. mcrichards@mednet.ucla.edu.
Owen MuirNYU School of Medicine and Hofstra-North Shore/LIJ School of Medicine, 154 N 9th Street Rear House, Brooklyn, NY, 11249, USA. Owen.muir@nyumc.org.
Steven Richard ChanSchool of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Davis, 2230 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. steven@berkeley.edu.
Michael CatonSchool of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Davis, 2230 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. mcaton@ucdavis.ed.
Carlene MacMillanDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Child Study Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, Manhattan Office: One Park Avenue 7th Floor I, New York, NY, 10016, USA. Carlene.MacMillan@nyumc.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We live in a digital age where information can be found instantaneously via the Internet. Studies have shown that consumers search for much of their medical information on the Internet, particularly utilizing blogs and social media platforms. As the mental health field is riddled with misinformation and stigma, this offers a unique opportunity for psychiatrists and mental health professionals to reach a broad audience for mental health education and advocacy. In this review, we discuss the various methods and techniques for blogging and social media. We then review the current recommendations for ethics and professionalism as well as make recommendations to strengthen our guidance in this new and evolving field.

Indexed as

BloggingMental HealthPsychiatrySocial MediaAttitude to ComputersConsumer AdvocacyHealth EducationHealth PersonnelHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorInternetAdvocacyBloggingEthicsInternetProfessionalismSocial media

Identifiers

PMID26377948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.