Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26377945›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

cis-regulatory analysis of the Drosophila pdm locus reveals a diversity of neural enhancers.

Jermaine Ross, Alexander Kuzin, Thomas Brody, Ward F Odenwald

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jermaine RossThe Neural Cell-Fate Determinants Section, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. rossje@ninds.nih.gov.
Alexander KuzinThe Neural Cell-Fate Determinants Section, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. kuzina@ninds.nih.gov.
Thomas BrodyThe Neural Cell-Fate Determinants Section, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. brodyt@ninds.nih.gov.
Ward F OdenwaldThe Neural Cell-Fate Determinants Section, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. odenwaldw@ninds.nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Analysis of Neural Precursor Cell cis-Regulatory EnhancersZIANS002820 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI ODENWALD, WARD F · 2010 to 2017
$5.3M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the major challenges in developmental biology is to understand the regulatory events that generate neuronal diversity. During Drosophila embryonic neural lineage development, cellular temporal identity is established in part by a transcription factor (TF) regulatory network that mediates a cascade of cellular identity decisions. Two of the regulators essential to this network are the POU-domain TFs Nubbin and Pdm-2, encoded by adjacent genes collectively known as pdm. The focus of this study is the discovery and characterization of cis-regulatory DNA that governs their expression.

resultsPhylogenetic footprinting analysis of a 125 kb genomic region that spans the pdm locus identified 116 conserved sequence clusters. To determine which of these regions function as cis-regulatory enhancers that regulate the dynamics of pdm gene expression, we tested each for in vivo enhancer activity during embryonic development and postembryonic neurogenesis. Our screen revealed 77 unique enhancers positioned throughout the noncoding region of the pdm locus. Many of these activated neural-specific gene expression during different developmental stages and many drove expression in overlapping patterns. Sequence comparisons of functionally related enhancers that activate overlapping expression patterns revealed that they share conserved elements that can be predictive of enhancer behavior. To facilitate data accessibility, the results of our analysis are catalogued in cisPatterns, an online database of the structure and function of these and other Drosophila enhancers.

conclusionsThese studies reveal a diversity of modular enhancers that most likely regulate pdm gene expression during embryonic and adult development, highlighting a high level of temporal and spatial expression specificity. In addition, we discovered clusters of functionally related enhancers throughout the pdm locus. A subset of these enhancers share conserved elements including sequences that correspond to known TF DNA binding sites. Although comparative analysis of the nubbin and pdm-2 encoding sequences indicate that these two genes most likely arose from a duplication event, we found only partial evidence of sequence duplication between their enhancers, suggesting that after the putative duplication their cis-regulatory DNA diverged at a higher rate than their coding sequences.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticGenetic LociAnimalsBase SequenceBrainCluster AnalysisConserved SequenceDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression RegulationGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene OrderGenes, ReporterHomeodomain ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataNeurogenesisDrosophila ProteinsHomeodomain Proteinsnub protein, DrosophilaPOU Domain Factors

Identifiers

PMID26377945
PMCPMC4574355
OpenAlexW2128770658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.