Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26377899›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2016

Neural correlates of interactions between cannabidiol and Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol in mice: implications for medical cannabis.

S M Todd, J C Arnold

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. A randomised controlled trial of vaporised ΔEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2019
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Effects of Cannabidiol on Locomotor Activity.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Receptor mechanisms underlying the CNS effects of cannabinoids: CBAdvances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.) · 2022
    Article
  15. Form and content of Jamaican cannabis edibles.Journal of cannabis research · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Effects of daily ΔDrug and alcohol dependence · 2021
    Article
  18. Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Cannabinoids and Potential Drug-Drug Interactions.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Interactions between cannabidiol and ΔBritish journal of pharmacology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S M ToddBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
J C ArnoldBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIt has been proposed that medicinal strains of cannabis and therapeutic preparations would be safer with a more balanced concentration ratio of Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to cannabidiol (CBD), as CBD reduces the adverse psychotropic effects of THC. However, our understanding of CBD and THC interactions is limited and the brain circuitry mediating interactions between CBD and THC are unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether CBD modulated the functional effects and c-Fos expression induced by THC, using a 1:1 dose ratio that approximates therapeutic strains of cannabis and nabiximols. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Male C57BL/6 mice were treated with vehicle, CBD, THC or a combination of CBD and THC (10 mg·kg(-1) i.p. for both cannabinoids) to examine effects on locomotor activity, anxiety-related behaviour, body temperature and brain c-Fos expression (a marker of neuronal activation). KEY

resultsCBD potentiated THC-induced locomotor suppression but reduced the hypothermic and anxiogenic effects of THC. CBD alone had no effect on these measures. THC increased brain activation as measured by c-Fos expression in 11 of the 35 brain regions studied. CBD co-administration suppressed THC-induced c-Fos expression in six of these brain regions. This effect was most pronounced in the medial preoptic nucleus and lateral periaqueductal gray. Treatment with CBD alone diminished c-Fos expression only in the central nucleus of the amygdala compared with vehicle. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These data confirm that CBD modulated the pharmacological actions of THC and provide new information regarding brain regions involved in the interaction between CBD and THC.

Indexed as

Medical MarijuanaAnimalsBody TemperatureBrainCannabidiolDronabinolDrug InteractionsExploratory BehaviorMaleMiceMotor ActivityNeuronsCannabidiolDronabinolMedical Marijuana

Identifiers

PMID26377899
PMCPMC4813392
OpenAlexW2174548557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.